Page 720 - Conclusions News Today

Conducted a sweeping and systemic interference in our election. the second is that obstruction of justice occurred. now, you cannot read the report chapter and verse fact after fact without reaching those conclusions. >> julian, she didnt say the "i" word as trump calls it, but was she hinting at impeachment? >> well, its the situation we are in. almost every democrat would agree with what hillary clinton said, including speaker pelosi at many moments, but what do you do next? do you wait for th...

Starting to see the deeper the dive we take maria into the mueller report were starting to find out some of the conclusions and actually some of the facts that they put forth in there, are misrepresentation of what we actually know. john soleman did some reporting recently that would suggest that part of the mueller report indicated one individual had a connection with russia, when indeed they did not. i think youll find others in there where it seems like all roads lead to russia in the mueller...

Mattered back in 1973. he told the public what nixon had been doing to try to stop the investigation, and in this case its the wrong timing. were talking about someone from the nixon era discussing the mueller investigation and the trump presidency so its hard to imagine that his long-term perspective, while valuable, is real going to shape this very rigid partisan polarized view that weve had of what to do next. >> right. well, the presidents rival until 2016, hillary clinton, she was asked abo...

Bannon. trump became the president because steve bannon entered the campaign and had a vision for how this would work. they then went on to have this very peculiar, to say the least, relationships. i think its one of the most interesting, dramatic relationships in modern politics. they love each other, they hate each other, they are attracted to each other, they are repulsed by each other. they are wedded to each other and always trying to escape each other. so through that all, my conclusion --...

Going just protract ourselves in 12 to 18 months not in term of fatalism with people who dont have morals. i grand that will happen and more in terms of the american public that will go through 18 or 12 months of this with no underlining collusion and crime there. >> you are in with the merits and the guardrail it produces? >> congress should do its job on a basic level. read the report and come up with conclusions and be honest about it. thats in the way that amash resonates with me. i dont kno...

Straightforward and they have done it before. they could have factual conclusio conclusions. nixon completed offenses and it wasnt just like an indictment. an indictment is an accusation referring to someone else for trial. that is what i proposed it should do. now in the process of the hearings the house might educate the public and mitch mcconnell might give in and the whole thing might go in a direction that nancy pelosi quite rightly say social security not very likely. but who is afraid of ...

Mueller report, actually read it, which all of us in this auditorium are more than capable of doing, you come to two inescapable conclusions, the first is that russia conducted a sweeping and systemic interference in our election. the second is that obstruction of justice occurred. now, you cannot read the report chapter and verse, fact after fact, without reaching those conclusions. >> so im just curious, do you think that is her saying impeach now? and what sway, if any, does she have in this ...

Dont have. this idea that it doesnt matter what you call it is belied by the facts. >> thats right. what we would find is the politics are so uncertain that we should put them aside. we had three processes in our history. any scientist would say three is too small of a number to do ex-trapilation to conclusions. if the house were to have impeachment hearings and do everything they could to prevent an investigation into what russia did in the ongoing influence and crafted very precise articles of...

Because his testimony was wrong. >> does this attack add up to you? >> no, it doesnt. i mean, mueller has not testified. as a matter of fact, thats one of the disagreements that had been sort of sort at a stalemate here in washington, the democrats want him to testify. he says he doesnt want to. so the president, im not sure what hes referring to. perhaps hes talking about a letter that mueller wrote to barr to sort of get him to clarify what had been some misleading comments from the attorney g...

Is the letter he had to do to straighten out his testimony because his testimony was wrong. >> i just have to say none of what he just said happened, none of that happened. actually it was the attorney general who got it wrong. remember, muellers letter, complaining that barrs summary "did not fully capture the context, nature and substance of this offices work and conclusions" and mueller hasnt testified. the entire debate right now is about whether and when he will. the judiciary chairman jerr...