Page 840 - Conclusions News Today

>> the only way they will apologize, tucker, is if the press presses them on that. you made this comment. you read back the comment. now we have learned and, again, we dont know but lets say we do learn, what do you have to say now? you know thats not going to happen. and, look, its that theme that we talked about over and over again. all trump stories, almost all come from a foundation of guilty. whether thats yes, trump must have collusion with the russians therefore is he guilty. the coming m...

Rob: welcome back. senator kamala harris of california called out for tax tweet. the democratic candidate for president in 2020 quoted out the average tax refund is down 170 bucks compared to last year. lets call the presidents tax cut what it is, a middle class tax hike to line the pockets of already wealthy corporations and the 1%. >> "the washington post" chimed in on this tweeting, quote: fact checker kamala harris leaps to unwarranted conclusions in tax tweet. while refunds are down as she ...

Im not sure how i could have been clearer. i said is before were we have no factual evidence of collusion between the trump campaign and russia. >> yesterday we saw this, a split between the two leaders of the senate intelligence committee. that was chairman richard burr and you just heard that he said his committee has now know collusion, however, the ranking democrat on the committee, senator mark warner says, quote, respectfully, i disagree. im not going to get into any conclusions i reached ...

Ready to treat differently with a pill? otezla. show more of you. theres breaking news on capitol hill and the senate committees investigation into possible collusion between the trump campaign and russia. last week, the committees republican chairman said they had not seen any evidence indicating collusion. late this afternoon, top democrat on the committee said senator mark warner broke burr saying, and i quote, respectfully, i disagree. im not going to get into any conclusions ive reached b...

Conclusions without -- >> it is the committee that had the fbi, and comey respected burr and had a lot of respect for him and was willing to work with him. this is certainly interesting how this has developed. >> so one of the factual disputes or the content disputes is we have 16 meetings between trump campaign officials and russians. chairman burr would say those are probably stupid and we dont have evidence that they colluded. the word collusion. i want more information because thats suspicio...

Think? one set of facts with two different conclusions? >> well, thats possible. i mean, again, consider the word "collusion," right? collusion is actually not a legal term. theres no particular definition of it. is it collusion when the presidents son, donald trump jr., invites russians to trump tower in order to give him dirt on the political opponent? is it collusion, you know, the conversations that we still dont know much about that manafort, when he was running president trumps campaign ha...

>> congressman himes, appreciate it. here now, shan wu is a former federal prosecutor. joining us as well, longtime political sage, david gergen. david, do you think this is going to come to, especially for a committee like the senate intelligence committee, one set of facts leading to two very different conclusions? >> not really. i think were still in the midst of an investigation in which, oddly, these two men are actually -- each of those 20ese men, i think, is telling the truth. senator b...

To be held accountable for that. but its too early to draw those conclusions just yet. >> the other conclusion is whether or not there is any evidence whether the president himself or even candidate trump knew of any of what some might call collusion, if its donald trump jr. meeting with the russians. or other things like that. >> thats a good question. i mean, obviously, if the president knew that these contacts were going on, authorized these contacts, if the president said, hey, and im not sa...

It could come down to -- one set of facts but two different conclusions? >> thats possible. consider the word collusion, collusion is actually not a legal term. there is no particular definition of it. is it collusion when the presidents son donald trump jr., invites russians to trump tower in order to give him dirt on the political component? the conversation that we dont know about that manafort when he was running president trumps campaign had with constantine. we know there was all kinds of ...

Conspiracy between the trump campaign and russia. here now to discuss sol wise enbe enberg, byron york. sol, how different might muellers conclusions be, however, from the senate intel committees report? well i dont think theyll be any different at all. you have to remember he has far more power, far more investigative power, subpoena power, power to compel witnesses than the senate does. and hes got a very highly trained professional staff with him. and its been very clear to knowledgeable ob...