Page 915 - Conclusions News Today

Obstructing and resisting this nomination with everything theyve got. they just want to delay this matter past the election. thats not my supposition, mr. president, thats their plan. according to another member of the judiciary committee senator from hawaii. thats their plan. so soon i expect that we will hear at the conclusions of the expert prosecutor, who questioned both witnesses at last weeks hearing arent reliable, or that the fbis investigation was not infinite or endless enough for thei...

>> and, you know, we know that the results of the fbis investigation will remain confidential. only among senators, we also know that it wont draw any conclusions around what agents find. senators will be left to do that task. so the question here, do you see this as a process that can avoid being politicized, where lawmakers effective lyft see what they want to see? >> well, one always sees what they want to see in these types of investigations. i think the investigative report will go to white...

The event whether or not it was brett kavanaugh before receive came forward. we know the democrats fanned out across the yale campus to do it. somebody else came up and said kavanaugh did in the past drink a lot to the point where he blacked out. how you would know where somebody blacked out is yawnged me. steve: they were on the team together. brian: ohio do you know somebody blacked out? ainsley: they have to have evidence. even though he might have drank in high school and drank a lot at yale...

Of the evidence standard, that is a lower standard. so will our democratic colleagues listen to this expert opinion although it conflicts with their political mission? dont hold your breath. nor am i optimistic they will stay consistent and accept the conclusions of the supplemental background investigation the fbi is now conducting on top of its six prior investigations of judge kavanaugh. democrats demanded a supplemental investigation. they proclaimed it would be a game changer. the democrati...

The criticism youll hear from republicans in the wake of this is that, listen, the fbi never reaches conclusions. it only makes -- it only does what are called 302s, they issue these reports and leaved it up to the appointing body to make the decision on that. is that actually a justification to dismiss the reports? or is that just not the way it is and always has been? thats the way the background checks work. >> thats exactly right. the point is to give the senators enough information that the...

Former fbi assistant director. appreciate it, chris. >> good to be here, ed. how are you? ed: doing great. start with what joe biden said. he said his words are being twisted. hes making it very clear that at the end of the day, the fbi is going to get he said/she said. was he right then or knew think its possible the fbi is going to get corroboration for the sexual assault allegations? >> i think uncle joe is right this time. hes right about the fact that the fbi does not render opinions or con...

Alcohol and drug use. the argument about listen, this is the white house who will limit this or can limit this is a tempest in a tea pot. if there are credible allegations r allegations, they will run those to ground. >> what we heard from kellyanne conway said it is not a fishing expedition. limited in scope. from our reporting, overall drinking history is not part of it. the fbi is taking direction from the white house. agents make no conclusions. the fbi sees the results. then listen to sarah...

A former fbi assistant director joins us now. lets start with what joe biden said. his words are being twisted. we played a long clip. he is making it clear at the end of the day the fbi will get he said she said. was he right then? was it possible the fbi is going to get a corroboration for sexual assault allegations. >> the fbi does not render opinions or conclusions, something reports facts and to get straight what is going on. these are called special inquiries. they are not investigations i...

♪ >> fbi explicitly does not, in this or any other case, reach a, period. so when people wave an fbi report before you, understand, they do not, they do not, they do not reach conclusions. steve: hes right and that was then senator joe biden back in 1991 dismissing the effective news of an fbi investigation during the clarence thomas hearings. so what does this tell us about the current fbi probe into judge brett kavanaugh. here with reaction is jonathan turley. how would you grade joe biden o...

Win back the publics trust? do you think it will all float away after the investigation overall with the president? >> i think what they have done is working towards that what we saw in the last election, james comey come out, make conclusions in front of the country when it was not his job. questionable activity. peter strof is gone, andy mccave is gone and currently under investigation. james comey. they are looking to see how they can improve. if people are involved in things dishonest, they ...