Page 971 - Conclusions News Today

420 or 421 where it talks about how peter strzok was prioritizing the rush investigation over the hillary clinton email probe. obviously, the ig report is filled with facts and the ig -- if you read deep into the several hundred page report, you will see some conclusions being made. peter strzok clearly was in a position for his bias was overcoming his better objectivity. >> harris: does anybody lose their job behind this at the fbi or the doj? >> some already have. >> harris: since this report ...

Dont like it. but conclusions do matter. if we are going to trust the inspector general who is supposed to take this nonbiased approach, then who do we trust? >> sandra: i want to get byron to respond to that because i know when i spoke to you earlier. earlier, we were talking about peter strzok and whether or not he was officially going to testify. now not only to see peter strzok up there and answering questions to members of congress, but finally hear the stories. i mean this could be very re...

At such a high level by the intelligence community, we dont make that decision by the intelligence communicate at this time. it limited the members that can see it as well as the staffs what were doing right now is and i ask the deputy attorney generals office to help facilitate this, to go back to the tell community and let us know how we can address whatever caused this to be classified at that high level so we can make sure that we can write it at a level and get it to the members, including ...

Inspector general himself, michael horowitz today as well as the fbi director, christopher wray. certainly an opportunity after a weekend of reaction poured in to the actual public release of that i.g report, sean. what do you expect to hear? >> i think and hope by distri district -- direct questioning by congress well get a better understanding what they came to the conclusions they did and why they feel in the case of president trump, all of the actions weve seen the text messages, etcetereter...

Prosecution, we found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were the result of improper considerations including political bias, rather were exercising prosecutorial discretion by the prosecutors based on their assessment of the facts of the law and past department practice. our review also included a fact-based detail add saysment of certain specific investigative and prosecutorial decisions that were the subject of controversy. it was necessary to select particular investigative ...

Department. we found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were the result of improper considerations including political bias but rather were exercises of prosecutorial discretion and their practices. >> im joined by clint watts. hes a national security analyst and author of the new book "messing with the enemy: surviving in a world of hackers, russians and fake news." im also with glen hirschner. he spent 30 years in washington, d.c. and worked for bob mueller. clint, i want to s...

And concern that if he didnt do that it would appear that he and more importantly the fbi were trying to hide the ball. >> other senior fbi officials are also found to have exercised poor judgment. singled out. senior agent peter strzok. who in a text message to former attorney, lisa page said well stop it. a reference to trumps election. >> a lot of people are interpreting that in a nefarious way. that hes going to stop trump from being president. >> texts cast a cloud over the credibility of t...

Listen to these findings from the inspector generals report on the handling of the clinton e-mail investigation. error of judgment. serious error of judgment. extremely poor judgment, and a gross lack of professionalism. these are conclusions that were drawn respectively about the conduct of former attorney general of the united states. the former director of the federal bureau of investigation and fbi special agents assigned to one of the highest profile investigations in buthe bureau history. ...

Reasonable. even though i disagree with some. people can see an unprecedented situation differently. i pray no director faces it again. >> his response to the report i think is classic james comey. it diplomatic and doesnt criticize the report. the conclusions drawn are reasonable. even if he disagrees. >> reaction from capitol hill is swift. >> couldnt be a more strong, of those who wish to say there was bias. >> democrats are already saying that this report shows that james comey may have cost...

Terms my kids made, he didnt start it. i mean, this started with discussion of michael flynn and so forth long before juligiulia ever came on board. its used as an attack on the president by implication and its become its own subject of the discussion. i dont think -- its not like hes coming at this out of the blue. hes responding to discussion thats been taking place in the mainstream media, which the media largely initiated. >> im sorry, ken, i have to stop you. first person to raise this was ...