Page 23 - Condition Precedent News Today

Chairman who is leading the impeachment inquiry determine relevancy for lack of a better word defense witnesses is flawed? >> yeah. so this was the exact same process that took place in the clinton impeachment. the same process in the nixon impeachment which is the minority gets the right to request witnesses. if theyre relevant, they will be accepted. its hard to know what to do otherwise in an environment where people are bringing all kinds of extraneous conspiracy theorys to explain whats goi...

These articles of impeachment, isnt the minority hearing day now irrelevant? >> i believe it is and i believe thats the concern that many of us have who institutionally love this place. >> okay. mr. raskin, even if chairman nadler didnt believe chairman nadler didnt believe the house rules required him to schedule the minority hearing a day prior to marking up the articles of impeachment, as a member of judiciary and rules committee, wouldnt you agree it would have been better for the institutio...

The minority has asked for a day of hearings on the matter of the december 4th hearing which was the constitutional grounds for impeachment. i am willing to work wutith the minority to schedule such a hearing but not before todays mark-up of the articles of impeachment. the house rule does not require me to schedule a hearing on a particular day, nor does it require me to schedule the hearing as a condition precedent to take anything specific legislative action. otherwise the minority would have...

Foundation if they actually do articles of impeachment. certainly as a condition precedent, they need to ushissu subpoenas. they can go to court quickly to issue subpoenas, but they have to get it on track. the court may move along quick quickly. >> i just want to make a point of the building blocks of the case here, the handful of lower level state department officials are critical of this issue. what did giuliani do? who helped him in the government? what did they know about it? were they nerv...

Legal jeopardy, my last question to you? >> absolutely. we have a combination of bribery, the foreign corrupt practices act at richl here because were paying favor of withholding funds and expecting a condition precedent that favors the president favorably before the funds are given and we also have efforts to conceal the very document we had in this conversation by people in the white house. we have the state department involved. we have the justice department involved. this is a major scandal ...

Are racist and sexist and throw granny over the cliff. >> democrats care about power. that is what this is about. they are trying to delay a vote so it does not occur. republicans must not let it happen. if they do not confirm judge kavanaugh they will lose the senate. >> sean: senator collins, i dont always agree with her. she said its not fair to either side. she is right. >> right. >> sean: right. >> and the explanation we are getting from chrstine blasey ford doesnt make sense. citizens dont...

Clarence thomas? every two years, republicans are racist, and sexist and throw granny over the cliff. >> democrats care about power.e that is what this is about. they are trying to delay a vote so it does not occur. republicans must not let it happen. if they do not confirm judge kavanaugh they will lose the senate. >> sean: senator collins, i dont always agree with her. she said its not fair to either side. she is right. >> right. >> sean: right. >> and the explanation we are getting from chrst...

The growing backlash against californias sanctuary law reaches los angeles. we are going to talk to a local complement leading the charge. but first, the killjoy democrats versus an optimistic nation. thats the focus of tonights angle. three americans held captive in north korea are returning home tonight because president trump made it happen. through smart and at times unconventional moves, trump has brought dictator kim jong un to the negotiating table, and this release was obviously a condit...

Condition precedent to the contract. what that means is the airline has agreed to carefully transport your baggage from one location to another and get it to you on time. the fact that the line did not do that means they have reached an agreement. if i was that person -- if i have my garment bag not delivered to me on time for the day, not only good going to sue for the fee i paid but if i have to buy clothing in another suit and tie to come on fox, im going after the airlines for the cost of th...

Because they were at a spot in california where they had freeways that couldve taken them anywhere in america in any direction north, south, they had the route 10 couldve taken them all the way to florida. they stayed there. >> did he go to pick a fight? was that the idea? the condition precedent? once and for all he would show them? well have to wait and see. >> yeah, and its -- the idea, the notion that hours later this event would end roughly where it began when they had an opportunity to get...