expanded the individual rights of corporations and blocked government regulation and so it is directly parallel to that. the health care bill is being challenged right now in the lower courts and the claim that the conservatives are making is that the health care bill violates individual liberties and that s always the way it s done. to say there are individual liberties at stake when the real rights involving the rights of corporations. what s your prediction here? a very close case. i predict that health care plan will survive ultimately although we ll see challenges to the financial regulation programs. justice kennedy is not willing to go all the way back to the bad old days when the supreme court blocked major popular legislation. it s a close thing. the amazing thing is the world you define in this brilliant book about the personalities of these four justices, they created modern america. they shape what we have to an extraordinary degree and their personal relationships
especially an appellate judge, is a job someone tells you what to do and you listen. not having that experience means you re less differential. i think that s a plus to start with. i think that on today s court in order to be a powerful voice on the court, you can t be a predictable vote and that s justice o connor and constituents kennedy. talk about being persuasive. she s up against justices from the conservative wing of the current court who are very precise and confirmed views. i can t imagine as persuasive as elena can be, i have a hard time thinking she will persuade justice thomas. it s all about the vote, which is 4-4, in which justice kennedy is the person who is going to make the determining decision and justice stevens and kennedy had a good relationship and sometimes it looked as though they were influencing each other. can justice kagan with her very
and kennedy who can go either way, depends on the case, have expanded the individual rights of corporations and blocked government regulation and so it is directly parallel to that. the health care bill is being challenged right now in the lower courts and the claim that the conservatives are making is that the health care bill violates individual liberties and that s always the way it s done. to say there are individual liberties at stake when the real rights involving the rights of corporations. what s your prediction here? a very close case. i predict that health care plan will survive ultimately although we ll see challenges to the financial regulation programs. justice kennedy is not willing to go all the way back to the bad old days when the supreme court blocked major popular legislation. it s a close thing. the amazing thing is the world you define in this brilliant book about the personalities of these four justices, they created modern america. they shape what we have
good, diplomatic skills, develop that kind of relationship with justice kennedy? it s going to be interesting. scorpions. an excerpt on our blog cnn.com/parkerspitzer. noah feldman, thank you for being here. an accidental touch can turn ordinary into something more. moments can change anytime just like that. and when they do men with erectile dysfunction can be more confident in their ability to be ready with cialis for daily use. cialis for daily use is a clinically proven, low-dose tablet you take every day, so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications, and ask if you re healthy enough for sexual activity. don t take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. [ man ] don t drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache, or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erec
so justice kagan does have that distinctive feature. does that help or hurt? i think it s a huge plus. i think being a judge, especially an appellate judge, is a job someone tells you what to do and you listen. not having that experience means you re less differential. i think that s a plus to start with. i think that on today s court in order to be a powerful voice on the court, you can t be a predictable vote and that s justice o connor and constituents kennedy. talk about being persuasive. she s up against justices from the conservative wing of the current court who are very precise and confirmed views. i can t imagine as persuasive as elena can be, i have a hard time thinking she will persuade justice thomas. it s all about the vote, which is 4-4, in which justice kennedy is the person who is going to make the determining decision and justice stevens and kennedy had a good relationship