Latest Breaking News On - Constitution of the united states america - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

Constitution of the United States of America | Definition, Summary, Amendments, Analysis, Importance, & Facts

Constitution of the United States of America, the fundamental law of the U.S. federal system of government and a landmark document of the Western world. The oldest written national constitution in use, it defines the principal organs of government and their jurisdictions and the basic rights of citizens.

Constitution of the United States of America - Amendments, Ratification, Bill of Rights

Constitution of the United States of America - Amendments, Ratification, Bill of Rights: A brief synopsis of the amendments to the U.S. Constitution, along with links to articles on each, is provided in the table.

Constitution of the United States of America - Civil Liberties, Bill of Rights

Constitution of the United States of America - Civil Liberties, Bill of Rights: The federal government is obliged by many constitutional provisions to respect the individual citizen’s basic rights. Some civil liberties were specified in the original document, notably in the provisions guaranteeing the writ of habeas corpus and trial by jury in criminal cases (Article III, Section 2) and forbidding bills of attainder and ex post facto laws (Article I, Section 9). But the most significant limitations to government’s power over the individual were added in 1791 in the Bill of Rights. The Constitution’s First Amendment guarantees the rights of conscience, such as freedom of religion, speech, and the press, and the

Constitution of the United States of America - Civil Liberties, Bill of Rights

Constitution of the United States of America - Civil Liberties, Bill of Rights: The federal government is obliged by many constitutional provisions to respect the individual citizen’s basic rights. Some civil liberties were specified in the original document, notably in the provisions guaranteeing the writ of habeas corpus and trial by jury in criminal cases (Article III, Section 2) and forbidding bills of attainder and ex post facto laws (Article I, Section 9). But the most significant limitations to government’s power over the individual were added in 1791 in the Bill of Rights. The Constitution’s First Amendment guarantees the rights of conscience, such as freedom of religion, speech, and the press, and the

word. tomorrow, we are doing something a little different on the velshi banned book club. we are featuring a work of writing that is arguably the most weaponized in our nation's history. a work of writing that has been challenged for removal, not by florida or texas, or moms for liberty, but by a former president of the united states. a work of writing that has been quoted in almost as regularly misquoted for generations. tomorrow, we are talking about the constitution of the united states of america. i'll be joined by two all-star constitutional scholars to help me dig into the sacred document. jeffrey rosen, the president of the national constitution center. and akhil amar, professor of law and political science at yale university, and host of the americas constitution podcast. and we've had such a great reaction to the velshi banned book club, that we're making it a podcast ourselves. each week, i'll be joined by the author of a band book. authors like margaret atwood,

we need to go from the ground up and say, what works and what doesn't? unfortunately, i don't think that is what we get without massive pressure from congress. i think there were some members who are very focused on this and will continue to have two exercise that kind of pressure. we need a lot of ground to make in order for people to do anything. >> harris: it didn't do any resetting that you talked about. ben domenech, thank you. country music star craig morgan shocking fans who were expecting a routine concert. instead, they got this patriotic surprise. >> i am craig morgan and i do solemnly swear to support and defend. to support and defend the constitution of the united states of america. >> to support the constitution of the united states of america. >> harris: marsha blackburn helped him reenlist with the army reserves at 59 in "the focus" next. ♪ ♪

previously in this case when it comes to the january 6th case of the special counsel is investigating he had said very recently that he thought the conduct was reckless but not criminal. again, reiterating here that he feels that former president trump put himself above the constitution and that that is disqualifying for a candidate for president. so he's saying here that the 45th president, donald trump, should be disqualified from running for president. but he also said that he'd hoped it wouldn't come to this, that he wanted this left to the american people. obviously to determine there as they vote ahead in the election. of course pence a rival of donald trump in that election although he is polling significantly, significantly behind the former president. trump meanwhile is scheduled to be in court tomorrow after federal prosecutors charged him with four separate counts in this indictment, all related to his attempt to hold on to power after the 2020 election. it's a 45-page indictment that says trump, quote, enlisted co-conspirators to assist him in

are -- you know, he can't run away from the legal aspect of this. he said he can't assess whether the special counsel has the evidence to back up the indictment but he seemed to get a little closer than he'd gotten before. before he said the conduct was reckless, not criminal. now he's talking about -- he talked about the constitution before. he's also mentioning the law. >> right. exactly. and i think look, you can see the struggle of the former vice president and you've seen it over the last few months, right? where he's been struggling to decide what to do. whether he was going to -- how far to fight the effort to go testify. he has done all of the things to try to make sure that he's looked -- he's not exactly helping the justice department against donald trump but also to make it clear that what trump did was not lawful. and the words he used in that very interesting extended sound bite there was he said that what the former president was doing was not in concurrence with the

criminal indictment. and i can't assess whether or not the government has the evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt what they assert in the indictment. and the president's entitled to a presumption of innocence. but for my part i want people to know that i had no right to overturn the election and that what the president maintained that day and frankly has said over and over again over the last 2 1/2 years is completely false and it's contrary to what our constitution and the laws of this country provide. you know, i'm a student of american history. and the first time i heard in early december somebody suggest that as vice president i might be able to decide which votes to reject and which to accept, i knew that it was false. our founders had just won a war against a king, and the last thing they would have done was vest unilateral authority in any one person to decide who would be the next president.