At this point, the mayors budget request to all departments was not to add any positions so were pushing the envelope a little bit, because we think we can justify it based on the fees, but when the issues come up. I will take a little bit of exception to what ms. Hester said we just rubber stamp them, we spend a lot of time looking at them. The number of adu approved, we spent a lot of time looking at these issues when they do come in and Preservation Planners do look at them. My point is, there will be more than one person devoted to the work. Commissioner moore one additional question, the expenditure budget, i see capital and equipment, 19 fy 1920 to become zero and material and supplies increasing by 200,000, that is a time when youre moving. Does that mean that youre not adding equipment and why is the number zero, i thought you would need a boost with new space, new equipment is happening, so you would want up to date equipment. We absolutely want uptodate equipment. Given the l
35 were somewhat familiar we think that reflects social desire ability by us. What you call lying, which is that top number. Those very familiar is probably more reflectives those with a functional knowledge. There is an incline nation to not admit your lack of knowledge. There is an Educational Task to have voters understand the sea wall, where it is, why it is important to the community. The good news when we give the respondepartments a draft of the bond ballot message. This is the best way to understand the bond measure. At the begin we show them a model of what that 75 word ballot question might look like. It is the one piece of information every voter will receive before they cast the ballot. They may not read the ballot or newspaper but they will see the question. When presented with language for a potential 500 million bond, 73 indicated yes, 11 undecided in excess of the twothirds supermajority required for approval this. Is very favorable compared to recents bonds the city pu
Capital improvements if we continue to occupy the building in 2012 this give us a sense of the dynamics 43 and a half Million Dollars well speak about the numbers were talking about today it gives an indicator of the rapid acceleration of the marketplace our objectives are manyfold we heard loud and clear in the hearing not too long ago regarding in property the desire to maximize wherever possible the hours yield we have an overarching goal related to a strategy to find alternatives Office Locations it is Affordable Housing issue weve been working or able to blend into this project were pleased with well get into those details an opportunity to take advantage of the transit ordinary opportunity here at margaret and van ness to create better connections with the van ness station and the proposers recognize that we see great potential. Its a chance to maximize the value of this asset were at the peak of the marketed we feel that and this is the time to sell this proposed if ever a time
Finalists im available to answer any questions thoughts on that. Thank you mr. Updyke anything else is this is the end the presentation. Yes. And supervisor mar. I wanted to thank you it thank mr. Updyke and the budget analyst for their upcoming suggestions i feel suspicious anytime were giving up to waive a state ordinance at the local level and giving up the boards authorize o authority i want to say my understanding of the legislation before us is that the Real Estate Office wants to get the best bank for the buck of valuable transit oriented sites connected with the gll site ill be asking for a better explanation of this complex deal i know also in my framing we have the worst Housing Affordability crisis and any public parcels to be used for Affordable Housing or mixed use for the prop k housing balance of 50 percent of Affordable Housing we should be doing Everything Possible and coming up before the November Ballot is surplus policies for initiate i have questions how that facto
Report were better served as a seller in that marketplace by taking the approach of final authority and moving with the finalists im available to answer any questions thoughts on that. Thank you mr. Updyke anything else is this is the end the presentation. Yes. And supervisor mar. I wanted to thank you it thank mr. Updyke and the budget analyst for their upcoming suggestions i feel suspicious anytime were giving up to waive a state ordinance at the local level and giving up the boards authorize o authority i want to say my understanding of the legislation before us is that the Real Estate Office wants to get the best bank for the buck of valuable transit oriented sites connected with the gll site ill be asking for a better explanation of this complex deal i know also in my framing we have the worst Housing Affordability crisis and any public parcels to be used for Affordable Housing or mixed use for the prop k housing balance of 50 percent of Affordable Housing we should be doing Every