On Charles Stella with friends of ethics. We have been in discussions with board president on the question of the whistleblower amendment. Theyve asked for some guidance in our opinion on how to organize the hearing. So, i will send the Commission Executive director a brief memo on that so that she will see what we have suggested. Commissioner board of i think i have to warm up herems. Breed and her staff and they were actually talking about generating a bit of a crowd or notifying the public in general, which we can implead you for thatfor you but you have your own contacts with as well. But there was some thought by the board that this should attract some interest on the part of the labor and City Employee groups so that is what i thought was. So, i did one you let you know if anything comes up with a we need to bring it up with you or bring back to you we will. The tech thank you. Thank you. Premise of the Ethics Commission a director of San Francisco opened up limited where youre a
State through s d 20 where theyre sold and limiting what smoking can occur in 2005 we adapted the moll act that built on the limitation for sale explicit but consumption and had thats where we call forth with the one thousand rule for schools and recreational facilities advocating for those no 18 years of age this meets all the requirements those are things that were developed could have been recreational facilities or recreational fascists over 18 like or chiropractor d but is explicit we have realize in effect for more than 10 years subsequent in 2011 the state adopted prompt rules it is 6 hundred feats to the in this case the studio across the street this is the justification for denying it but those are as much right no proof neatest for the desirability . As of right and find exceptional or extraordinary to deny those are professional services that karate exceptional or extraordinary that should result in denying one and certainly one of the items you can consider in the hearing a
[gavel] welcome ladies and gentlemen to the regular scheduled meeting of the San Francisco Ethics Commission for june 27 2016. I will call the roll. Commissioner tan, here. Hayon, here. Chiu, here. All are present and accounted for. Churning to item 2, Public Comment. On matters appearing or not appearing under the agenda. I would as we have a very long agenda, which i anticipate comments, hopefully the comments will be limited to something other than this on the agenda. Thank you. Good evening commissioners. On Charles Stella with friends of ethics. We have been in discussions with board president on the question of the whistleblower amendment. Theyve asked for some guidance in our opinion on how to organize the hearing. So, i will send the Commission Executive director a brief memo on that so that she will see what we have suggested. Commissioner board of i think i have to warm up herems. Breed and her staff and they were actually talking about generating a bit of a crowd or notifyin
R0 this allows for more units of housing and belowmarketrate housing which guess balanced nee needed the city tishman inspire has been a great partner we look forward to working with them im note this is 100 percent units a union and has our support this is significant i mean local folks will be employed making good minimum wage and for our youth through our student apprenticeship programs i cant stress that enough we urge you to move this project forward today by recommending it for approval to the board of supervisors thank you for your time. Thank you. Commissioner president fong and commissioners my name is alicia im a resident of rincon park and a member of the safe house the park and the Association Im speaking in opposition to the proposed one hundred foot height increase on fulsome ill focus my discussion on a financial deal the city is making with the developer to increase the height from three to four hundred feet this deal is a grateful for the developer it is a steel is a v
Shopping until they find one that will tell them what they want to hear that [speaker not understood] is better, not what the law and the facts dictate, which is that the maintenance alternative is better and will cause less impact on the environment . The open space Contingency Fund is for acquisition of new park space. Its not a slush fund for [speaker not understood] produce a report. Its not a slush fund to pay for a change in gardening at sharp park which is what a lot of the restoration proposed really is. More importantly, the proposed restoration at sharp park is an implementation of plans in the [speaker not understood] before the eir has been complete. We really cant implement whats in the plan before the eir has been finalized and that point should have been made with fish and wildlife. So, im very concerned about the idea of this third consultant and we have a fourth one and [speaker not understood]. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker. [inaudible]. Good afternoon. My name i