vimarsana.com

Latest Breaking News On - Consumer claims - Page 9 : vimarsana.com

Banking trade groups file amicus brief with CA Supreme Court in case involving whether FTC Holder Rule s recovery limit includes attorney s fees | Ballard Spahr LLP

When a returned hired car is found to be damaged

The facts of the case A consumer hired a car from a local car rental company. As agreed in the sales contract, when the rental period ended, the consumer left

Observers bemused as RDO attempts to claim major Club La Costa victory during insolvency struggles

Following the recent, stunning  High Court victory over Club La Costa (CLC), in which administrators BDO were replaced by the creditors preference FRP, the RDO have attempted to present another victory, but on behalf of CLC.   Actual victory CLC were dealt a serious blow last month when the creditors choice of insolvency practitioners were allowed to take over the administration proceedings, allaying fears in some quarters that the wronged timeshare consumers would not be able to claim their court awarded compensation as part of the administration proceedings. From 2015 onwards the Spanish courts have been issuing financial penalties against the giant timeshare company in response to their continual disregard for consumer laws enacted to protect customers from

CA Supreme Court to decide if FTC Holder Rule s recovery limit includes attorney s fees | Ballard Spahr LLP

The California Supreme Court recently agreed to hear an appeal in Pulliam v. HNL Automotive Inc., a case with significant implications for the amount of money a plaintiff can recover when proceeding against a dealer/seller under the FTC Holder Rule.    Officially titled the “Trade Regulation Rule Concerning Preservation of Consumers’ Claims and Defenses,” the Holder Rule requires sellers that arrange for or offer credit to finance the purchase of consumer goods or services to include a specified “holder notice” in the credit contract.  The notice must state that any holder of the contract is subject to all claims and defenses the consumer could assert against the seller of the financed goods or services, with the consumer’s recovery limited to the amount paid by the consumer under the contract.  

If You Purchased Clover Valley Ground Coffee from Dollar General Between January 1, 2015 And April 1, 2021, A Class Action Settlement May Affect Your Rights

If You Purchased Clover Valley Ground Coffee from Dollar General Between January 1, 2015 And April 1, 2021, A Class Action Settlement May Affect Your Rights News provided by Share this article Share this article PHILADELPHIA, April 30, 2021 /PRNewswire/ The following statement is being issued by Kroll Business Services regarding the Clover Valley ground coffee settlement. A proposed Settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit known as Mike Allen, et al. v. Dolgencorp, LLC, et al., Case No. SUCV2020000385, Superior Court, White County, Georgia.  The lawsuit claims that Dollar General Corporation and Dolgencorp, LLP ( Dollar General ) deceptively and unlawfully labeled, packaged, and marketed Clover Valley ground coffee, overstating the amount of coffee each package can actually make. The lawsuit claims Clover Valley ground coffee does not contain enough ground coffee to make the stated number of cups when following the brewing instructions on the label. Dollar Ge

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.