Well, i think the data i showed, especially that curve, pretty clearly demonstrates that that we can identify the vast majority but not all cases within 21 days. So when were talking about declaring a country free of disease, then twice that, 42 days is the criteria that w. H. O. Issues. And i think intuitively you can run the graph out there and you can see there are no new cases at the far end. So it seems to me that thats, that additional safety precaution is clear . No . Obviously not. One more response, yes. What would you say to that second little hunt when you looked at your very nice geometric distribution, roundabout 14 days, it looks like there was a small second peak . And i wonder, if an alert reporter were to ask you, does that suggest that the time point one should be later and that the true doubling is to take care of unexpected, unrecognized second outbreaks . Or is it really the doubling of the that, you know . Thats a good observation and i think you need to just keep
Voting booth is the way republicans are talking about it. They are talking about the failure of the leadership and a list of examples. They are not railing on ukraine, but saying there is a narrative they are trying to build about them being a failure and they can use this as a check mark. Can i offer a slightly contrarian view . One of the surprising things about the ukraine and russia situation is the extend to which they have not headed for the exits. Putin very cleverly created a golden opportunity for them to do that. The nato meeting was happening and he creates a ceasefire. The terms of which he dictates himself. He claims she not involved in the conflict. Nevertheless he said heres a ceasefire that works this way and this way. Just as everyone is gathering. They dont do what i expected him to do is say a ceasefire. Lets back off. They went the next step. Maybe its not enough and as much as it should have been, but we have very little economic skin in the game. But they did. I t
Mandarin. The one place where that is not an issue is the senate. It might show up. Even in the energy in colorado is in the 7, 8, 9 contested senate races down to the wire. We will see them raise the spector of National Security and or Civil Liberties in the last couple of weeks before the election. Before we throw it open to questions, we have the small matter of iran. What happens then . Up to and including the lame duck is anybodys guess. Lets say we have a deal. There will be a push by the administration most likely to reduce the sanctions we have on them over the Nuclear Program and other nepharious activities. That will be pushed into next year. You might see an immediate lame duck push. The president promised no deal. We are going sanction them. Thats what he said. What the president wants next year in the event that there is a deal gets harder. Nobody wants to be seen as the people who used up. Thats not a popular position. It is much less popular with republicans. Some of the
Cyberspace. It is a vast expanse of cyberspace, the fact that it touches everyone and soon it will touched almost everything and changes how people are going to think about it. When the internet was first built, infrastructure was not connected to it and didnt rely upon it. End users dont worry about the underlying security of the code, only that it worked. Governments didnt understand and didnt see why they should care about it. Nobody particularly care that the technologist set up the internet to be governed in a highly decentralized function outside of government based structures and they didnt incorporate strong security. But not everyone cares about these things, at least to some degree. Governments are waking up to the fact that they really need to care about what happens on the internet and how it works. For all sorts of reasons both good and bad. Companies are waking up to this fact and citizens are waking up to this fact. So as a result, what used to be able to be decided on a
He is our guest this week on the communicators. Commissioner welcome. The debate on Net Neutrality is a moving target right now on the hill and the fcc getting ready to do something. Whats the debate morph into at this point in your view . Guest first, peter thanks for having me on yet again and you picked a good time. The agency is em broiled in a number of high profile issues, Net Neutrality first and foremost among them. To me, the debate has morphed into a political football which i think is unfortunate because it obscures some Common Ground namely that everyone believes in a free and open internet. And i, for one, embrace as a part of that thenchairman powells four internet freedoms lawful content, applications of ones choice the freedom to attach devices to ones network and transparency in terms of service plan information. The question is how do we embrace those four freedoms in the context of regular ration . Regulation . I, for one, believe the bipartisan consensus that has be