Page 485 - Contempt News Today

Information, particularly in mark meadowss case. he violated a subpoena. congress has the same subpoena authority as a court, and then -- but we dont enforce it. we rely on doj to do that. i certainly hope they criminally charge mark meadows with contempt as we have charged him with in the house. i think any of the information the doj sees that leads to broader conspiracy or anything leading all the way up to the top, they should take to a court or to a grand jury. >> help us understand this, ba...

All ways you can get in illegally and flag a border agent down and take him off a job. and he becomes your travel agent and personal uber driver and in charge of feeding you and doing everything else but the president wont look to listening to his own people on these issues. there is a reason why people feel this way. is he not curious enough to want to know what that is? >> the left having come from the left and working decades to try to make sure americans realize this. the defendant does not ...

The 2020 race was called. hes someone who the committee previously voted to hold in contempt because he wasnt cooperating with their subpoena. he came back to the table, he is cooperating. now based on the roughly two hours of testimony he gave yesterday, well see whether or not the committee decides to refer that contempt referral to the full house floor or if he complied sufficiently that they feel they got what they need from him. >> nicholas, a big question in front of the committee, whether...

Well as to the justice department in any investigation it may be or will be undertaking with regard to the whole january 6th overturning of the elections. so i think that there is a strategic reason for him to cooperate, and i think he is well aware of it. >> and barbara, im just wondering, the fact that he was the personal attorney to the president at the time, is there a lot of attorney/client privilege situation that he could call on to try and not answer direct questions about this? >> yeah,...

Executive privilege, thats something trump lost in the supreme court by 8-1. and yet you have peter navarro still invoking executive privilege again right now to try and not tell the truth to congress. i think i woulds absurd and theres only one remedy for it. merrick garland has to prosecute these people for contempt. its already been about 60 days since congress referred the meadows case to the justice department. the justice department hasnt done anything, much to my dismay. i think the ameri...

Ail the us. brian: they never recognize natural immunity. >> they believe working class americans should listen to everything they say even though they have so much contempt for them. brian: news week is lucky to have you. coming up. get ready to cue the music, start the clock. the fighters are in their corner. carley shimkus, report for duty. here she is, she is ready to here she is, she is ready to take me on.

I attended those. and its incredibly comforting to see that police officers all over the country and in many instances all over the world, would come out to support a fellow officer and their family. >> mike fanone, i really appreciate your time tonight. thank you. >> yes, sir, thank you. more evidence now on the former administrations attitude to the public they were supposed to be serving. the attitude seems to have been, at best, one of disregard, at worst, outright contempt. the issue is t...

And i will fix it. but labours leader said mrjohnson was a man with no shame. by routinely breaking the rules he set, the prime minister took us all for fools. he held peoples sacrifice in contempt. he showed himself unfit for office. but prime minister, the british public are not fools. they never believed a word of it. they think the prime minister should do the decent thing and resign. it was a former conservative prime minister who silenced the raucous house of commons with this. either my r...

Official to show up. jeffrey clark is his name. he met two months after being held in contempt for failure to cooperate. what do you know about jeffrey clarks meeting with the committee? >> so, it was less than two hours, anderson, so im going to say that he did not cooperate very much and that it is likely he took the fifth a lot. i -- i do think its important, just for context, look, jeffrey clark is not a household name. but he is critical in this investigation because he was working apparent...

Politicians to abandon principle or to reverse the polarities when it is convenient in the age of donald trump. so, again, the hypocrisy, the irony, but also the consistency of donald trumps contempt for obeying the law and this is a reminder, how many of our rules and laws are based on an honor system? the assumption that the president of the united states will not be someone who will flout these laws, who will not violate these laws, but then you put donald trump in the oval office, this is in...