This is from april. Its an hour. Case 15577. Trinity lutheran church. The state of new york excluded the Learning Center from a safer playground from children because it was operated by a Church Rather than a not for profit. Number one that the policy in this case is not neutral. Churches are not eligible for the benefit here. Assuming theres no serious risk of an establishment violation, thats off the table, are there ever instances in which status, religious status can be used to deny religion or religious believers, benefits from the state . Or are you saying that religious status can never be the basis for it. The question is why would it matter. The next question then i guess wasnt long ago now back in 1947 this court said in no uncertain terms, with tax money imposed to pay for building or maintaining churches or Church Property and doesnt that fit this case . And if so. I dont think it does. We have to be careful in not establishing a church not to deprive religious people or or
This is from april. Its an hour. Case 15577. Trinity lutheran church. The state of new york excluded the Learning Center from a safer playground from children because it was operated by a Church Rather than a not for profit. Number one that the policy in this case is not neutral. Churches are not eligible for the benefit here. Assuming theres no serious risk of an establishment violation, thats off the table, are there ever instances in which status, religious status can be used to deny religion or religious believers, benefits from the state . Or are you saying that religious status can never be the basis for it. The question is why would it matter. The next question then i guess wasnt long ago now back in 1947 this court said in no uncertain terms, with tax money imposed to pay for building or maintaining churches or Church Property and doesnt that fit this case . And if so. I dont think it does. We have to be careful in not establishing a church not to deprive religious people or or
Solely because of the preschool is operated by a Church Rather than a secular, not profit. The state has made several important concessions in this case. Number one that the policy in this case is not neutral and that number two based on the religious character churches are not eligible for the benefit here. This admitted discoloration against religion violates this court free exercise principles. First, as stated in mcdaniel and smith, free exercise clause prevents the government from imposing special disabilities on the basis of religion and used a religious status. And forcing a choice between the exercise of religion and receiving either a government benefit, right or privilege. Assuming that there is no serious risk of an establishment violation, thats off the table are there any instances in which status, religious status, can be used to deny religions or religious believers benefits from the state or are you saying that its absent in the establishment clause problem . The status
Law school, university, and the broader Orange County community to talk about what is most important but neglected institutions, the Supreme Court. Before turning to the program, i want to thank a number of people and organizations who made this possible. The special events team, from. He law School Thanks also to cspan for recording this event for the first time. I also want to single out for special thanks the man in the middle of the stage. [no audio] it is no exaggeration to say that none of us would he here today, this event or the law school with such a reputation for teaching and the cause of justice. It was your hard work that made it flourish, your kindness which made it a joy to go to work each day. We will always be in your debt. Thank you for everything you have done. [applause] two years ago at this event, there were comments on the hodges case, recognizing the right to samesex marriage. A 2015 term was likely to be the Empire Strikes back. Case that would have affected la
Sufferage d that surprise you . It particularly surprised me that Jesse Fremont opposed women sufferage, opposed women getting to vote. She seemed the one to be most obvious to it. But i think she didnt want to be public about that because it would reflect poorly on her husband later running for president in an era when that was not a popular political position. When you did the first first lady series, we discovered by course of doing our call ins and the like that there was a real hunger for womens history. And we have so many moms and daughters watching the series together. And they were calling us, even three generations and the like. So what we realized, we tapped into a vain of not enough told in this country. And theyre not understanding the role of the civil war. Thank you very much. Well have more American History tv tomorrow night from our american artifacts series. Well look at artists of the American Revolution and visit the andy warhol museum. Later, a conversation on the