Page 69 - Contexts News Today

Very much at the white house. so where does the impeachment inquiry go from here? lets talk to shan wu. good to see you, shan. so the whistleblowers attorney telling lawmakers that he or she is willing to answer written questions. how unusual is this? >> reporter: its not too unusual. sometimes whistleblowers in different contexts will appear, perhaps with their identity shielded. its not very necessary in this case, fred, because a whistleblower by definition isnt necessarily the lynch pin of a...

Thereby to replace the five minute rule which is familiar to people which works in a lot of contexts but doesnt really work here. it also sets forth the procedures that will govern the judiciary committees completion of its investigation. so essentially the intelligence committee, oversight, foreign affairs, ways and means, anybody else who believes their fact investigation has produced evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors will turn it over to the judiciary committee. it will be the judiciar...

Phone call the way the transcript, which is really a summary says it was. and more remarkable is you keep seeing e key figures emerge in this. john bolton is a key figure that is in these meetings that saw some sort of problem in it. tough wonder based on the news was that part of the reason he left the white house. you look at sondland and rick perry, they both show up in different contexts and it doesnt quite match other stories weve heard. i think yesterdays testimony was quite devastating be...

For that and we needed to make a change so we could have questioning by the professional counsel, by the staff and thereby to replace the five minute rule which is familiar to people which works in a lot of contexts but doesnt really work here. it also sets forth the procedures that will govern the judiciary committees completion of its investigation. so essentially the intelligence committee, oversight, foreign affairs, ways and means, anybody else who believes that their fact investigation has...

I felt it was messed up. we should say, red state and daily mail the two that published this. that is utterly indefensible. you are complicit in a crime. a statutory violation. >> not just complicit. you are making it a story. >> thats what you can be get around. >> this is something thats not appropriate. it has nothing to do with the other part that we should be addressing. >> you can also report on that without posting the images which is part of it. the other thing that i thought was a great...

That. >> right. >> red state and daily mail are the two out lets that published this. that is utterly indefensible. you are essentially complicit in a crime, a statutory violation. >> you are making it now a story. its a titillating story. >> thats the other thing you cant get around, exactly. >> its not appropriate. it has nothing to do with the other part that we should be addressing. >> you could also report on it without posting the images, which seems to me part of whats happening. the othe...

>> paul. >> hi, ari. freestyle libre 14 day system. >> hi. you can do it without fingersticks. paul, what did we just see in that briefing room? learn more at freestylelibre.us and what would you do with a suspect if you had them on a charge and they talked like that? >> i would think this is my lucky day as a prosecutor. its not every day you get the co-conspirators all admitting to the conspiracy on national television. so heres the thing about -- >> if you were investigating a case that invol...

>> reporter: thank you. mr. president, i was asking if the two of you discussed possible digital tax, and where the discussion might be going in particular as it might relate to google and amazon and others. thank you, sir. >> translator: yes, i understood the question. no, we did not talk about this. of course, this is an open issue. its very important. it is being discussed in a number of different international contexts so that this important issue can be discussed and solved. >> president tr...

Klobuchar are out of line? >> i dont know know the contexts of those statements. ive been one of these people pushing much stronger ethics laws in washington. this revolve from congress lobbying is absolutely wrong. one day you could be bullying for something and the next day you could reap a big reward. we have a system broken and i think if anybody stated what their believes on what their ethics should be, more power to it. i will push you to go forward on those ethics laws, but please do not ...

Only one stating back to the 1940s has there ever been a penalty of $250,000 that high reached. that is the jurisdictional limit that we were able to levy for a discriminatory act. in fact in most situations, whether or not theres even a decision to levy a penalty is made by looking at the circumstances of each individual case, including, of course, the size of the entity, the circumstances underlying, sophistication. in many instances fines are not even levied. >> housing and public accommodati...