Page 8 - Coordinate Bench News Today

The Karnataka High Court last month dismissed a petition filed by Congress leader D K Shivakumar seeking to quash the sanction for prosecution granted by State to the CBI, to investigate the offences...

The Karnataka government on Thursday informed the High Court that it has published a public notice in local and national newspapers, seeking information on availability of burial grounds in the...

ITAT Delhi held that there is no copyright on live events, and therefore, the fee received towards live transmission cannot be taxed as royalty in terms of Section 9(l)(vi).

Meet Kerry Adler, a Canadian fraudster and terrorist who thinks and has now been spending money on propaganda thus branding me as a criminal because I

The reprieve came following an order by the Indore bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court.

Is an accused is entitled to statutory bail under Section 167(2) CrPC when no chemical analysis report is filed along with the final report, within the 180 days period mandated under the NDPS Act?

17 hours ago Arguing that the Right to be Forgotten gives people control over their digital lives, the petition cited multiple cases filed before courts in India and abroad; even turning to the PDP Bill for legal precedent.  An Indian reality television celebrity has approached the Delhi High Court with a petition invoking his Right to be Forgotten wherein he urged the court to direct relevant persons to remove posts, videos, and articles from nearly a decade ago that allegedly presented him ...

By Taxscan Team - On April 26, 2021 10:15 am The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad Bench held that the exemption can not be disallowed under India-Austria Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) only for want of Tax Residency Certificate (TRC). The assessee, Ranjit Kumar Vuppu is a Non- resident individual, filed his return of income for the A.Y 2014-15 on 31.07.2014 admitting total income of Rs.10,04,580/-. During the assessment proceedings under section 143(2) of the Act pu...

Updated Jan 21, 2021 | 18:49 IST Four of the five judges on the SC bench – AM Khanwilkar, Ashok Bhushan, S Abdul Nazeer and BR Gavai – dismissed the petitions but DY Chandrachud provided a dissenting opinion that ran up to 16 pages. The Supreme Court of India.&nbsp | &nbspPhoto Credit:&nbspPTI Key Highlights It was only in 2016 when the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act was notified Since its notification, the case...