nadler committee truly finds their voice and their stride, they could have hearings that are impeachable-like, impeachment-esque in everything but title. absolutely. i thing that s i think that s a core function of what the congress of the united states is about and i think the democrats right now are wasting some time and for, you know, i understand they wanted to see would the president assert executive privilege? now we know. he has a view of executive privilege that would make nixon blush. and so, you know, there is only one remedy that stage which is to call for an impeachment or impeachment-like inquiry to pierce these bogus notions of executive privilege. we could fight it out in the courts and undoubtedly the democrats would win but that would take a long time. president has gotten recently expansive in the answers to some questions. chuck todd got him to admit that his biggest regret was the appointment of jeff sessions. here s what he said to hill tv today, tonight, actua
their voice and their stride, they could have hearings that are impeachable-like, impeachment-esque in everything but title. absolutely. i think that s a core function of what the congress of the united states is about and i think the democrats right now are wasting some time and for, you know, i understand they wanted to see would the president assert executive privilege? now we know. he has a view of executive privilege that would make nixon blush. and so, you know, there is only one remedy that stage which is to call for an impeachment or impeachment-like inquiry to pierce these bogus notions of executive privilege. we could fight it out in the courts and undoubtedly the democrats would win but that would take a long time. president has gotten recently expansive in the answers to some questions. chuck todd got him to admit that his biggest regret was the appointment of jeff sessions.
nadler committee truly finds their voice and their stride, they could have hearings that are impeachable-like, impeachment-esque in everything but title. absolutely. i think that s a core function of what the congress of the united states is about and i think the democrats right now are wasting some time and for, you know, i understand they wanted to see would the president assert executive privilege? now we know. he has a view of executive privilege that would make nixon blush. and so, you know, there is only one remedy that stage which is to call for an impeachment or impeachment-like inquiry to pierce these bogus notions of executive privilege. we could fight it out in the courts and undoubtedly the democrats would win but that would take a long time. president has gotten recently expansive in the answers to some questions. chuck todd got him to admit that his biggest regret was the appointment of jeff sessions. here s what he said to hill tv today, tonight, actually, about
information. i m ready to take it on. it is unthinkable what he said. it disintegrates at the very core of what our democracy is about. this is the president of the united states inviting in a foreign entity to play in america s elections and doing it so cavalierly without any notion that that may be crossing a line. and we get used to the line crossing but this is one of the days where you wake up and you just say, this is the president of the united states looking to actually dismantle a core function of our democracy. so what would you say to those who say, look, what is wrong with listening as the president said? just listen and then he drew this parallel with presidential diplomacy saying, look, i meet with foreign leaders all of the time. what do you make of that. like when he was comparing his recent talks with queen elizabeth and so if and they talked about everything and so if she had mentioned something about the political race upcoming in 2020, somehow that
you mean since the administration won t cooperate with them, why should the congress cooperate with the administration? yeah. yeah. zero. like 0.0 incentive. the problem is we re one subway stop from a real constitutional crisis. because when you say we re not going to obey, congress does not have the right to have anything, it puts the courts now in a very tough position. they either have to come in and tell the president, oh, by the way, you have to follow the law and we then don t know will strup obe trump obey or the cou have to side with the president and say congress, you re null and void. either way, you re playing with the very, very core of the constitution over stuff that s minor and doesn t even matter. so that does put everything else in jeopardy. because when you put the core function of the republic in jeopardy, it s hard to cut deals on everything else. i just wonder. you said we re one stop away. it doesn t feel like we re pulling into the station. the reason