Page 77 - Corroborating News Today

Fbi investigation? especially after this second story came out yesterday. alex, do we have those clips, those quotes from the "new york times" and -- >> yeah, prep the new yorker one here. >> so this was in the new yorker. republicans seized on this language. in our initial conversations with the new yorker, she was reluctant to characterize kavanaughs role in the alleged incident with certainty. do you have the rest of it? >> the "new york times" now is coming. here. >> and then in the "new yor...

Disclosure within the next 48 hours of detailed allegations, as well as the identity of at least one of my clients relating to what she witnessed and experienced concerning brett kavanaugh and mark judge. and ultimately, were going to let the american public decide whos telling the truth. >> so this is about high school, if youre talking mark judge and kavanaugh, that was his friend in high school. one client will come forward, but you may have multiple ones. whats the difference between the one...

Disclosure within the next 48 hours of detailed allegations, as well as the identity of at least one of my clients relating to what she witnessed and experienced concerning brett kavanaugh and mark judge. and ultimately, were going to let the american public decide whos telling the truth. >> so this is about high school, if youre talking mark judge and kavanaugh, that was his friend in high school. one client will come forward, but you may have multiple ones. whats the difference between the one...

Say, lets stop the presses. hes right, i think mark judge must testify before this committee, hes a witness everyone -- >> laura: hes already signed a statement by the penalty of perjury that he has no a recollection of these events happening. no one who she claims was in a house party that judge kavanaugh said he was not out has any corroborating information about that party. so he has to testify. no, he doesnt. he could have been brought before the committee during the three and a half days th...

Yorker" piece. you have a witness from the "times" saying hes 100% sure that he learned about the relevant facts of this incident the same day or the day after. you have a corroborating witness. those witnesses should be called. they should be allowed to testify. deborah ramirez should be allowed to be heard. again, shes asking for the facts to be developed by a nonpartisan professional investigative body, the fbi, and what does the white house have to hide? what does judge kavanaugh have to hid...

Proven. but i dont just want to take accusations out of nowhere and say come on loud stop the presses. hes right, i think mark judge must testify before this committee, hes a witness, everyone -- >> laura: hes already signed a statement by the penalty of perjury that he has no recollection of these events happening. no one who she claims was in a house party that judge kavanaugh said he was not out has any corroborating information about that party. so he has to testify. no, he doesnt. he could ...

About something. if anyone has been paying attention over the last six to seven months, they know that i do not traffic in rumor and nonsense. i state facts and i have evidence to back it up. i made a lot of predictions over the last six, seven months. ive been proven right time and time again. and i would not make these accusations lightly. i understand the magnitude of the water, if you will, that were in presently. so im highly confidence in the accusations that are going to be made and the s...

Repeating what im hearing, believing that this is becoming less fair by the day, that everybody thats not on fox news has convicted him as a rapist or a serial predator. what do you think of charlies statement that the second investigation, the second report may actually undermine the first? >> i dont know if thats true. i certainly agree with the second thing that charlie sykes said which i dont understand to this day, this hour especially listening to brett kavanaugh last night why it is his p...

So its either three or four at this point. >> christopher: does michael avenatti still help democrats at this point? doesnt seem like he would do much to push the case. >> jessica: is not my favorite person. >> christopher: he said it was a corroborated story and "the new york times" and the new yorker said they couldnt and when he got pushed on this, she listed as a corroborating source someone who heard about it. that doesnt apply. she knows that. >> melissa: when you said youve heard about it...

She said that men should fundraise as well as she is fundraising off this as well so she is the only one showing the democrats cards that its political. they have been trying to take down judge kavanaugh from the beginning. now they are weaponizing allegations not corroborated to do that. >> juan: the other side is republicans are trying to push through judge kavanaugh. you have president trump tweeting you know, lets forget about whatever this woman had to say. and you have people now like susa...