Page 27 - Corrupt Intent News Today

Exonerated. become made clear there was obstruction of justice committed by the president. >> during your questioning of mueller today, congressman, you did lay out your case that president trump obstructed justice but mueller today you he didnt necessarily subscribe to your legal analysis. were you disappointed that he wouldnt give a clear answer on whether or not he believes the president committed obstruction? >> it was important for him to acknowledge the three elements of obstruction of jus...

Whether the president committed obstruction of justice, they need to look at all the presidents conduct and overall pattern of behaviors. is that correct? >> i dont disagree. >> figure. dr. mueller. director mueller. doctor, also. i will designate that, too. i have certainly made up my mind about what we have reviewed today, that it meets the elements of obstruction. including whether there was corrupt intent. what is clear is that anyone else, including some members of congress, would have been...

To ascertain true motive? >> no. >> when you talk about the presidents pattern of conduct that includes the 10 possible acts of obstruction that you investigated, is that correct, when you talk about the presidents pattern of conduct, that would include the 10 possible acts of obstruction that you investigated, correct? >> i direct you to the report for how that is characterized. >> thank you. let me go through the screen again. for each of those 10 potential instances of obstruction of justice ...

Evidence the president knew he should not have directed don mcgahn to fire the special counsel, correct? >> and where do you have that quote? >> page 90, volume 2. there is evidence that the president knew he should not have made those calls to mcgahn, close quote. >> yes, thats accurate. >> the investigation found substantial evidence that president trump repeatedly urged mcgahn to dispute he was ordered to have the special counsel terminated, correct? >> correct. >> invest found substantial ev...

Misconduct, end quote. for the nonlawyers in the room, what did you mean by, quote, potentially preempt constitutional processes? >> im not going to try to explain that. >> that actually is coming from page one of volume ii in the footnote is the reference to this. what are those constitutional processes? >> i think i heard you mention at least one. >> impeachment. correct? >> im not going to comment. >> okay. that is one of the constitutional processes listed in the report in the footnote in vo...

For the nonlawyers in the room, what did you mean by "potentially preempt constitutional processes?" >> im not going to try to explain that. >> that actually is coming from page 1 of volume to 2. in the footnote, what are those constitutional processes? >> i think i heard you mention at least one. >> impeachment, correct? >> im not going to comment. >> okay. that is one of the constitutional processes listed in the report in the footnote in volume 2. your report documents the many ways the presi...

Let me bring in our experts tonight, richard stengel is a top diplomat in the obama administration and former manager of time. caroline dealt with george papadopoulos and those in the probe directly. and nick, former federal prosecutor. good evening to each of you. great panel, if i may say so, on this big event everyone is waiting for, that the administration is apparently uncomfortable with. nick, what does it mean when the democrats want more from mueller than they will probably get and when ...

Rackle oppression because he didnt think women measured up. but also talking about the financial situation and having some, you know, colorful things to say towards the board that governs the finances of the island. so is this at the end about the rivalry between carmine julian cruz and the governor, fights about the government. what is it that you were saying its not about just the text messages. >> exactly. the text messages prove something thats been going on the island for years. and that is...

Act. he said a connection to a proceeding. donald trump knew there was was a grand jury proceeding. he was aware of it. he was talking about it. he was concerned about it. and thirdly he literally uses this language, there was substantial evidence of corrupt intent essentially, which is those are the three elements of the crime. so what democrats can do is literally say on page 47 you found in your report obstructive acts. trump knew there was a proceeding and there was substantial evidence. is ...

Administrations arguments for trying to add the question were contrived in a sense not true enough to get through a relatively low standard of review at the court. critics also pointed out that the way the supreme -- the way the trump administration was trying to get the supreme court to approve this could discourage people from participating, undercut immigrant communities and also according to evidence provided basically support a plot discovered on a dead operatives computer to try to help th...