would be. i keep playing that because it was the most embarrassing moment i ve had as an american vis-a-vis our president. in helsinki before the world next to putin, the guy responsible, you can see a little smile on his face as the president threw his own country under the bus, but he just keeps talking to him and obviously taking his advice. all this is undercut in the very next paragraph where the president blows up any argument. this was about broader corruption fighting by launching into a tirade against joe biden. he offers up this sharpie-worthy testimony of his donor buddy turn turned ambassador, gordon sondland. despite questions that persist about whether that call happened. it just happens to have the president saying everything he needed to say to clear himself from this using language that only the whistle-blower used, certainly not the latin that this president is used to saying. so i don t even know that it happened.
agreement made between president clinton and ukraine requires the president of the united states to cooperate in corruption fighting in the ukraine. trump was doing exactly what the president should be going. remember, none of this is real. what you are faced with is a democratic party desperately committed to destroying the president. they don t care what the facts are. they have an absolute deep passionate need, i would argue a pathological need to destroy the president even if if the process they cripple themselves. all of us who are trying to talk about facts misunderstood the conversation. this is a drama in which schiff and pelosi and others are living out their fantasies out of
to try and talk to people who maybe are disappointed with him who are frustrated about corruption the slow pace of reform and get them to pull back from the brink of the last moment and to go for him as a safe pair of hands because as as the polls have it and as the kind of feeling on the street here and here on this beautiful spring day seem to suggest it s not working there s been some discussion about how the candidates have been light on the issues one of the candidates focused on in their election campaigns. so petra pushing his campaign has been all about positioning himself as the commander in chief of the army. a father of the nation figure a kind of conservative campaign reminding people that he came to power twenty fourteen when russia had just an excuse me and the separatist conflict in the east was just getting going basically telling people had it not been for me that called it would have spread and you would have seen fighting the maybe even here in kiev so really pushing
a positive optimistic campaign talking about a change of generation the she she to fight corruption really shake politics up and also talking about people s incomes let s not forget ukrainians incomes are taking a real getting and people still have less money at the end of the month than they did five years ago before the war so that is really something despite the war that is on everyone s minds and corruption fighting corruption as a way of helping people to get a better sense of living is something that seems to be dominating people s agendas . that was the job usenet connally in kiev ukraine and a reminder of the top story we re following for you a wave of easter sunday bombings in sri lanka as killed at least two hundred seven hundreds more wounded the government has called the attacks a terrorist incident and blamed religious extremists several people have been reportedly arrested nationwide crew fuel is in place. you re watching news live from berlin up next
a kind of hands because as as the polls have it and as the kind of feeling on the street here and here on this beautiful spring day seems to just it s not working there s been some discussion about how the candidates have been light on the issues what are the candidates focused on in their election campaigns. so petra pushing his campaign has been all about positioning himself as the commander in chief of the i. me a father of the nation figure a kind of conservative campaign reminding people that he came to power twenty fourteen when russia had just the next crimea and the separatist conflict in the east was just getting going basically telling people had it not been for me that conflict would spread and you would have seen fighting the maybe even here in kiev so really pushing that national security agenda telling people that only he can stand up to russia whereas selenski has really gone for a bit more of a positive optimistic campaign talking about a change of generation the opport