material condition requested by the department of justice to the agreement reached between the government and the defendant. and then this statement came out 50 years ago. it goes on and on and on for page after page after page in tiny print just like it says it is a detailed recitation of the facts and the evidence. the justice department had amassed all of this evidence that the defendant had committed dozens of felonies. they described in this statement all the evidence they had. all the things they believed they had proof that the defendant had done. it was not a short recitation. it was thousands of words. it described years of allegations of extortion and bribery, just rank corruption. this guy taking envelopes stuffed with cash in exchange for official acts as a public official. they had it all documented. they had records. they had receipts. they had notes. they had witnesses who had been involved in the corruption scheme who were set to testify
document, this is what he said after seeing it. this is a critical point. they re reporting to this point has always been that joe biden denies any knowledge of what hunter and his brother jim have been doing. according to the document we have that is a lie. joe biden absolutely knows and has been engaged in this throughout the entirety of this corruption scheme that has been going on. knowing about it are benefiting from it are very different things. the allegation is that there were payments. allegations from one source. also told by somebody that s all the document that it does not include payments to joe biden. not a direct investment to the president. it does mention hunter biden and payments and sort of conversations about how these things will be hitting through different shell companies and there are references that you are seeing members coming out and talking about that they are
document, this is what he said after seeing it. this is a critical point. they re reporting to this point has always been that joe biden denies any knowledge of what hunter and his brother jim have been doing. according to the document we have that is a lie. joe biden absolutely knows and has been engaged in this throughout the entirety of this corruption scheme that has been going on. knowing about it are benefiting from it are very different things. the allegation is that there were payments. allegations from one source. also told by somebody that s all the document that it does not include payments to joe biden. not a direct investment to the president. it does mention hunter biden and payments and sort of conversations about how these things will be hitting through different shell companies and there are references that you are seeing members coming out and talking about that they are
want to go back, pluck out that one piece of payment and that one tip from it and say that this is somehow some shocking revelation when it is already part of something that has been discredited and debunked in terms of accusations about joe biden being involved in some sort of corruption scheme. so that s what it is about. unfortunately, it takes a while to spain but they wanted to hold the fbi director in contempt of congress for the first time in american history for come playing with their subpoena. they wanted to see the document. he sent the document over. the chairman and i got to see it. then the chairman demanded that he get to keep the document and them, well, that s not how we at any rate our confidential human sources. nobody will ever give us any information because there are a lot of details that would clearly reveal the identity of that human source through the
has been engaged in this throughout the entirety of his corruption scheme. so what democrats who have viewed the document say is that this piece of information which is a document in which the fbi talked to a human source who s said to have information about this investigation, it was more or less just a tip in the process of this investigation. they even contend that the attorney general william barr and his justice department decided not to take the investigation any further. now, there have been some reports there was some bit of a dispute within the justice department as to whether or not that s exactly true. so there is a lot of back and forth around this, but i do think the one thing we know for sure is this is only one piece of evidence. the other supporting facts behind the information that would allow to support this claim are not in this one piece of information, but again, the house is just beginning their investigation. so yesterday we talked about something else going