BAŞ REDAKTORDAN
Hamımızın Azərbaycan adlı bir Vətəni var! Qoynunda dünyaya göz açdığımız, minbir nemətindən dadıb isti qucağında boya-başa çatdığımız bu əvəzolunmaz diyar azərbaycanlı adını qürur və iftixarla daşıyan hər kəs üçün müqəddəs və ülvidir.
Müzəffər Ali Baş Komandan İlham Əliyevin rəhbərliyi ilə Azərbaycan Ordusu Vətən müharibəsində zəfər çalaraq erməni işğalçılarını kapitulyasiyaya məcbur etdi, düşməni qovaraq ərazi bütövlüyünə nail oldu.
Beyond the Central Vista verdict, key questions
Updated:
Updated:
January 09, 2021 12:12 IST
Public commitment in civic projects and procurement of professional services are areas that need definite improvement
Share Article
AAA
Public commitment in civic projects and procurement of professional services are areas that need definite improvement
The Supreme Court of India has cleared the decks for the intensely contested new Parliament and Central Vista projects in New Delhi. Limiting itself strictly to ‘the procedures sanctioned by law’, the majority judgment concluded that the government had followed all processes as stipulated by the regulations and could go ahead with the construction. This may have put an end to the litigation but it does not necessarily mean that such disputes and bitter situations would not recur. The critical questions on ensuring public commitment in civic projects, improving participatory processes in city-building, and effective procurement o
Hemanth Nimbalkar (L) and D Roopa (R). (Photo: Twitter)
IGP admin Hemanth Nimbalkar on Sunday rubbished the allegations that he favoured one company in the tender process for the Bengaluru Safe City project, envisaged earlier to make the city safer for women and children by installing over 7,000 CCTV cameras.
IPS officer (PCAS) D Roopa alleged that the tender was not held in the right manner and was biased. Meanwhile, Hemanth Nimbalkar rubbished the allegations and accused Roopa of impersonating the state s home secretary to obtain crucial details about the Rs 620 crore project.
Nimbalkar said call one and call two for the tender had taken place and Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) was a part of both bids, but due to the orders from the Centre and Karnataka government, the tender was cancelled as the order was about not procuring Chinese items.