then they talked a and the the attacker. a 21-year-old known to police was killed, and known as one of the attackers, and eight arrests for acts against the common good, a nnd none of those were cl classified as acts of terrorism. again, he was 21 years old and known the police, and the last arrest was in 2010 five years ago at the age of 16 years old. he went into some detail about the arrests of belgian, and that is the new information here. and the moanbique neighborhood is pop ulated by immigrant, and majority of whom from morocco and turkey. and so, again, he gave us a lot more details and what led toup the arrests to i d.a. i want to welcome in malcolm who is a counter terrorism expert, and he has studied the growth of the extremism in europe.
and said we re overhyping the threat because if it bleeds it leads. that plays into what secretary of state kerry says but no administration wants this embarrassing disconnect. what s going on behind the scenes do you think? i think that you have some people in the administration that are worried about their reputation and speaking the truth. you saw that with mr. clapper after his n.s.a. performance. he doesn t want that to come back again. then you saw the counter terrorism expert at the administration testifying on capitol hill about the recruitment for isis while you had the president of the united states saying they had been demorlzed and were in retreat. there is a sense of fantasy and i think the administration wants that sense of fantasy out there. michael flint said it is irresponsible to make the statements secretary kerry made. what they re doing is putting out a false narrative. that is why i say it is really almost orwellian
christian from the terrible slaughter. with me now, andrew and here in the studio, counter terrorism expert. andrew, first to you. the first amendment, i m going to read from your book. but the first amendment says that congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the preexercise thereof. so from your book, sharia versus freedom, i m going to read a question that you positive it. is jihad a religious right of those calling for it or is a human rights violation against those targeted? well i think the short answer without being glib is boast. and that is the conundrum that we face. with we go back and summarize 500 years worth of it, the great muslim intellectual said the
christian from the terrible slaughter. with me now, andrew and here in the studio, counter terrorism expert. andrew, first to you. the first amendment, i m going to read from your book. but the first amendment says that congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the preexercise thereof. so from your book, sharia versus freedom, i m going to read a question that you positive it. is jihad a religious right of those calling for it or is a human rights violation against those targeted? well i think the short answer without being glib is boast. and that is the conundrum that we face. with we go back and summarize 500 years worth of it, the great muslim intellectual said the
christian from the terrible slaughter. with me now, andrew and here in the studio, counter terrorism expert. andrew, first to you. the first amendment, i m going to read from your book. but the first amendment says that congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the preexercise thereof. so from your book, sharia versus freedom, i m going to read a question that you positive it. is jihad a religious right of those calling for it or is a human rights violation against those targeted? well i think the short answer without being glib is boast. and that is the conundrum that we face. with we go back and summarize 500 years worth of it, the great muslim intellectual said the following.