Sergeant at line item one weekly officer recognition certificate presentation of an officer who has gone above and beyond in the performance of their duties, Sergeant Victor hughes, sergeant number 1370, from the burglary unit. Good evening. Good evening, commissioners chief scott and director henderson. I am captain mahkota of the Major Crimes Unit and i am honored to be here tonight to present to you victor hui of the burglary auto unit. Sergeant hui is a 23 year veteran of the San Francisco Police Department. Sergeant hui has more than ten years as a sergeant. Over the course of sergeant huis career, he has had several patrol station assignments that include Central Police station Ingleside Police station, Taraval Police station, Southern Police stations, patrol foot beat and investigative unit. In addition to those patrol assignments, sergeant hui has been assigned to Numerous Special assignments that include the Violence Reduction team. The Patrol Bureau task force, the department
Item two, 247 17th avenue, conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance indefinitely. Item three, case number 201600585cua, conditional use authorization has been withdrawn. Further, commissioners under your item calendar, for the expansion review, this informational presentation is proposed for continuance indefinitely. I have no other items proposed for continuance. I had one item to speak to item eight for the residential expansion threshhold, but i believe it was to the subject matter rather than the continuance. Ok. So, well open it up for Public Comment on the items being proposed for a continuance. [inaudible]. Go ahead. Sure. Absolutely. Ok. Good afternoon. Heres a map that i was going to give you if we had the hearing today. I had mr. Webster make it. It shows all the r. H. Zones. Green is rh1, yellows the no. Red is the rh2 and yellow is the rh3 and you have the ability as a commission to deal with the numerical criteria. Its in the planning code. It says the Pla
Items proposed for continuance. The first one, conditional use authorization iss ed for continuance to january 18, 2018. Item two, 247 17th avenue, conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance indefinitely. Item three, case number 201600585cua, conditional use authorization has been withdrawn. Further, commissioners under your item calendar, for the expansion review, this informational presentation is proposed for continuance indefinitely. I have no other items proposed for continuance. I had one item to speak to item eight for the residential expansion threshhold, but i believe it was to the subject matter rather than the continuance. Ok. So, well open it up for Public Comment on the items being proposed for a continuance. [inaudible]. Go ahead. Sure. Absolutely. Ok. Good afternoon. Heres a map that i was going to give you if we had the hearing today. I had mr. Webster make it. It shows all the r. H. Zones. Green is rh1, yellows the no. Red is the rh2 and yellow is the rh
Inspection required which is to have what they call an inspector of record, which is an additional cost carried by the project sponsor to make sure the work is done according to the specs and these employees need to be certified by the state as an inspector of record. Okay. That would be some money. Joe, a couple of questions. Back on the Community Health centers, i think you mentioned but i didnt get it. Were working on mission and maxime hall and regards to chinatown and Infrastructure Improvements, are there still budgets for those or theyre going to be deferred to a future bond . Very good question. For chinatown Public Health center, the team is working with our consultant to better understand the seismic scope. We have learned that i think one of the best things to move forward with the next round of projects is to understand the total project scope. One of the things we learned earlier for both were identified as tender project when added to the bond program but since then weve
In observe the service and county that mayor lee gave for the city and council. Well resume the meeting. This meeting is now in session. Item two, opportunity for the public to comment on any matters within the jurisdiction that are not on the agenda. Good morning committee members, im dr. Derek kerr, a whistle blower. Why do organizations retaliate against whistle blowers . Its because whistle blowers have inside information about wrong doing and there by represent a threat. Whistle blowers are viewed as Insider Threats. Unfortunately the Whistle Blower Programs Quarterly Report issued in december includes a bulletin warning about Insider Threats. We are told these are employees who negatively affect organizational assets. That definition could qualify whistle blowers as Insider Threats because it depends on who defines what is a negative impact on an organization. The term Insider Threat is derived from National Security programs that were installed after the Chelsea Manning and Edwa