We want to welcome back Julie Roberts washington correspondent to talk about the Affordable Care act. Let me read from the fifth Circuit Court of appeals the recent ruling, the individual mandate is unconstitutional because it can no longer be read as a text and there is no other constitutional provision that justifies the exercise of congressional power on the ability severity building question we go to the District Court for analysis of provisions as they currently exist. It may still be none of aca is separable from the individual mandate even after the inquiry concluded. It may be the all aca is separable from the mandate and some of aca is separable from the mandate and some is not. What did they roll . It helps to go back to 2017 when the republicans had the white house, will senate and they wanted to replace the Affordable Care act and they cannot agree. People still remember john mccain turning thumbs down on the last try. They regrouped and at the end of 2017 republicans passe
To talk about the Affordable Care act. Let me read from the fifth Circuit Court of appeals the recent ruling, the individual mandate is unconstitutional because it can no longer be read as a text and there is no other constitutional provision that justifies the exercise of congressional power on the ability severity building question we go to the District Court for analysis of provisions as they currently exist. It may still be none of aca is separable from the individual mandate even after the inquiry concluded. It may be the all aca is separable from the mandate and some of aca is separable from the mandate and some is not. What did they roll . It helps to go back to 2017 when the republicans had the white house, will senate and they wanted to replace the Affordable Care act and they cannot agree. People still remember john mccain turning thumbs down on the last try. They regrouped and at the end of 2017 republicans passed a tax bill and one thing they did they reduce the penalty for
Constitutionally required in, cases for federal and state courts. Evangelista ramos was convicted of seconddegree murder when only 10 of 12 jurors found him guilty. At that point under louisiana law unanimous juries were not required but since the louisiana has passed a law requiring unanimous juries but does not apply retroactively to his case. He was sentenced to life in prison without parole. The Louisiana Supreme Court denied him a review. This is about an hour. In case 185924, ramos versus louisiana. Mister fisher. Mister chief justice, may it please the court. This court reaffirmed the wellsettled rule that Incorporated Provisions of the bill of rights applied the same way to the state as they apply to the federal government. Taking that as a given the state does not defend Justice Powells pivotal vote. That flouted president at the time and since been relegated to nothing but isolated relic of an abandoned doctrine. The states only defense in support of the judgment below, the s
His exercise to block from that account is in ability he shares in common with all twitter users. In holding that this was a First Amendment violation, the District Court made to critical errors. The District Court incorrectly concluded that donald trump was wielding the power of the federal government when he blocked plaintiffs from the account. Second, the court incorrectly concluded that the account was a forum from which plaintiffs are being excluded. Are you arguing that the only thing independent of his presidency in the account is his blocking or the account itself . Are you maintaining that position or just the blocking . When you are trying to analyze whether or not state action is being evoked, you look at the particular conduct at issue. You ask whether the particular conduct at issue is wielding the power of the government, whether privilege orr Authority Given to the defendant by virtue of their office. This twitter account is a designated public forum then . Is it a publi
Captioning performed by vitac in order to speak into that larger private forum. The discussions arent happening specifically on realdonaldtrump, theyre happening across twitter in response to things that he has said. And the best example i can give of this is that the replies themselves arent necessarily hosted on realdonaldtrump. If he were to delete a tweet, for example, the things that people have said directly to him would exist elsewhere. You could see them on the accounts that were on the account of the twitter of the individual account owner who had replied. They exist on a tab that says tweets and replies. So really these comment threads under realdonaldtrump are better seen as sort of a record of conversations that are happening across twitter. So when donald trump blocks someone, hes not keeping them from these conversations, hes not keeping them but hes making it much more difficult for them to access his tweets, though, isnt he . There are ways to go around this, with shado