Up next here on American History tv on cspan3, a conversation on the case from the Virginia Historical society. Jeter was not a white woman. Richard loving all agree was a white man. So Virginia State law not only rendered their 1958 marriage illegal, but also required a penalty of at least a year in prison for it. Circuit court judge leon f. Dizile chose to suspend their prison sentences if they agreed to leave the state. After a few years of exile, loving sought Legal Assistance to let them return home to virginia. Today our speaker will be focusing on the suit mr. And mrs. Loving brought against the commonwealth, a case that eventually made its way to the u. S. Supreme court. The lovings challenge the conceit that the state could tell two people that simply because they did not share the same racial identity they could not marry. And if they married that they should be in prison for doing. This be explore their tangled biographies on a ruling, a ruling whose echos can be heard in th
Up next here on American History tv on cspan3, a conversation on the case from the Virginia Historical society. Jeter was not a white woman. Richard loving all agree was a white man. So Virginia State law not only rendered their 1958 marriage illegal, but also required a penalty of at least a year in prison for it. Circuit court judge leon f. Dizile chose to suspend their prison sentences if they agreed to leave the state. After a few years of exile, loving sought Legal Assistance to let them return home to virginia. Today our speaker will be focusing on the suit mr. And mrs. Loving brought against the commonwealth, a case that eventually made its way to the u. S. Supreme court. The lovings challenge the conceit that the state could tell two people that simply because they did not share the same racial identity they could not marry. And if they married that they should be in prison for doing. This be explore their tangled biographies on a ruling, a ruling whose echos can be heard in th
Before the Honorable Supreme Court before the United States are admonished to give their attention. Landmark cases, cspans special history series produced in cooperation with the National Constitution center, exploring the human stories and constitutional dram as behind 12 historic Supreme Court decisions. Number 759, earnest miranda petitioner, versus arizona. We hear arguments of roe against wade. Quite often the most famous decisions are ones the court took that were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of 310 million different people who helped stick together because they believed in a rule of law. Good evening and welcome to cspan and the National Constitution centers landmark cases series. Tonight case number 11 out of 12 and this is a 1966 case, miranda versus arizona that helped to revolutionize policing in america. Youre under arrest. You have the right to an attorney. You have the right
Before the Honorable Supreme Court before the United States are admonished to give their attention. Landmark cases, cspans special history series produced in cooperation with the National Constitution center, exploring the human stories and constitutional dram as behind 12 historic Supreme Court decisions. Number 759, earnest miranda petitioner, versus arizona. We hear arguments of roe against wade. Quite often the most famous decisions are ones the court took that were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of 310 million different people who helped stick together because they believed in a rule of law. Good evening and welcome to cspan and the National Constitution centers landmark cases series. Tonight case number 11 out of 12 and this is a 1966 case, miranda versus arizona that helped to revolutionize policing in america. Youre under arrest. You have the right to an attorney. You have the right
Before the Honorable Supreme Court before the United States are admonished to give their attention. Landmark cases, cspans special history series produced in cooperation with the National Constitution center, exploring the human stories and constitutional dram as behind 12 historic Supreme Court decisions. Number 759, earnest miranda petitioner, versus arizona. We hear arguments of roe against wade. Quite often the most famous decisions are ones the court took that were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of 310 million different people who helped stick together because they believed in a rule of law. Good evening and welcome to cspan and the National Constitution centers landmark cases series. Tonight case number 11 out of 12 and this is a 1966 case, miranda versus arizona that helped to revolutionize policing in america. Youre under arrest. You have the right to an attorney. You have the right