Attack. This is an hour. United states of america versus donald j. Tmp. [indiscernible] good morning. Before you get started can i just get a couple of things on the record. Our jurisdiction was challenged by an amica. I do want to speak to you more about jurisdiction, because we still have to say we have the jurisdiction. Sove though you belvehere is jurisdiction with respect to the collateral order doctrine, how do you place tt in line with the asphalt case which specifically says in a crimil case, your jurisdiction needs to stem from the constitution the explicit as well in statutory l . We have three responses. If you look at the language that Justice Scalia discussed, a situation where the right is one, the legal and practical value would be destroyed and these claims of absolute immunity falls within that discrimination explicitly stating that and dont have communication with ytng in the statute. Disagree. The doctrine ariseesro article 2 and section 1. It is enrced by the impeac
Just get a couple of things on the record. Our jurisdiction was challenged by an amica. I do want to speak to you more about jurisdiction, because we still have to say we have the jurisdiction. So even though you believe there is jurisdiction with respect to the collateral order doctrine, how do you place that in line with the asphalt case which specifically says in a criminal case, your jurisdiction needs to stem from the constitution or the explicit as well in statutory law . We have three responses. If you look at the language that Justice Scalia discussed, a situation where the right is one, the legal and practical value would be destroyed and these claims of absolute immunity falls within that discrimination explicitly stating that and dont have communication with anything in the statute. I disagree. The doctrine arisees from article 2 and section 1. It is reenforced by the impeachment judgment clause which refers to trial. Wallace facility is talking about a situation where the r
Will the support in the party continue to grow. The fake charges put forth by Thet Biden Sham indictment, i would assume hes mentally ill. Will his top rivals rally around him or start to attack and can our democracy survive this challenge . My guests this morning, john lura and jamie raskin, a member of the january 6th attorney and the former lead january 6th impeachment manager. Joining me for insight and be analysis are hallie jackson, peter baker, republican strategist al cardenes and Kimberly Atkins stohr. Welcome to sunday. Its Meet The Press. Announcer from nbc news washington, the longest running show in television history, this is Meet The Press with chuck todd. Good sunday morning. Voters next fall may be faced with an unprecedented choice, whether to put former President Donald Trump back into the white house or to essentially sign off on his sentencing if he is convicted and send him to a prison or a Secret Service protected home. The latest indictment accuses trump to defr
Criminally charged for trying to overturn the 2020 election and hold on to power. The attack on our Nations Capital on january 6th, 2021, was an unprecedented assault on the seat of american democracy. Its described in the indictment it was fueled by lies. This is now the third criminal indictment against donald trump this year. Every time they file an indictment we go way up in the polls. One more indictment, and this election is closed out. Nobody has even a chance. As the charges mount, will his support within the party continue to grow . Fake judge has flipped forth by the biden sham. We call it a sham indictment, and the man thats i really believe hes mentally ill. Will his Top Republican rivals continue to rally around him or start to attack him and can our democracy survive this critical and unprecedented challenge . My guest this morning, trumps attorney john lauro and jamieraskin and the january 6th impeachment manager. Joining me for insight and analysis are. Nbc news senior
Dont yet know what the fate of Mark Meadows Motion to remove to Federal Court will be. Its very easy to look at this through a vacuum but remember, theres already a moment now to say can i get some of these cases into Federal Court. This is all considering and assuming thats not going to happen because without mark meadows or others it would be, you know, not 19 people. But this is going to be a very interesting hearing to get the room, the temperature of whats happening there. And also what is the preparation like right now for fani willis. Is she really ready to go . And are those Defense Counsels who asked for an earlier trial date, were they calling a bluff or will their bluff now be called . And we will find out fairly soon. Sara, its interesting because we know that as all of this is unfolding right now a federal judge could rule at any moment now whether to allow the former white house Chief Of Staff mark meadows to move his case from a state court in georgia to a federal trial.