Justice and made please the court, the issues here are unprecedented in every sense. Before these cases, no court had ever upheld the courts use of subpoena powers to the records of a sitting president with a broad swath of the president s personal papers to the let alone purpose of the a potential legislation. There is a reason this is the first time a set has attempted such a gambit. Because, grist has subpoena power, it is subordinate and when that power is deployed against the president , it must yield absent any longstanding tradition or compelling showing of need. The committees consent is neither condition and that should decide this case. The committees contend the subpoenas satisfy the limits this court has always applied to congressional subpoenas. But the arguments would render meaningless but the arguments would render those limits meaningless. They claim congress can you subpoenas to uncover individual wrongdoing simply because that the always informed efficiency of existi
Maryland and the district of columbia seek against the president the district committed several fundamental errands the suit i accept you to bring the microsoft two and a closer to if you can the plaintiffs are fundamentally mistaken in asserting that this power the court is powerless to correct any of those areas at this time. We have identified there is one overarching point and that is this the Supreme Court and cheney made it clear that the separation of powers of utmost taken, are of utmost importance when considering petitions involving the president of the note states. For example, the Court Appointed chief Justice Marshall to say in no case with the court be required against a private individual. And the court said the high respect do the office of the president must be considered throughout the entire proceeding. What does that imply in this case . The following. Their position is that even if the District Court aired in defeating debts refusing to dismiss the suit, even if ev
This courts decision will determine if the lawsuit can move forward. Oh yay or yay all people having any manner form of business before any u. S. Court of appeals Fourth Circuit for the court is now sitting god say the United States in this honorable court. With the house judiciary inaudible maryland and the district of columbia seek against the president the district committed several fundamental errands the suit i accept you to bring the microsoft two and a closer to if you can the plaintiffs are fundamentally mistaken in asserting that this power the court is powerless to correct any of those areas at this time. We have identified there is one overarching point and that is this the Supreme Court and cheney made it clear that the separation of powers of utmost taken, are of utmost importance when considering petitions involving the president of the note states. For example, the Court Appointed chief Justice Marshall to say in no case with the court be required against a private indiv
Thank you for the kind introduction. It is wonderful to see some many friends here. Some i have not seen in a year or two it seems. Backgroundre on my than what harvey said and i want lawecall it for the students are younger attorneys here because it is kind of integral to my life in Public Service. In 1982, i am sure we have people that were not born that, i was a law clerk. It is wonderful to be a law clerk but you also have to immediately start looking for your next job which i was. And i had a background in finance and i am a cpa so i thought i would be a perfect commercial litigator. Or so i thought. I was interviewing with the chicago law firms. Myself further, the largest law firms had about 230 partners in the chicago area to show you how things have changed. But i needed litigation experience i thought and so i applied for the attorney generals honors program. Behold, they want a four year commitment. When you are 27 years old, four years seems like a lifetime. And i very much
Politics of president ial with the fulcrums editorinchief david hawkins. Watch live at 7 00 eastern monday morning. Join the discussion. Host who we get to talk about the Supreme Court history for an hour. I want to start by understanding the court today. The way our court is structured and evolved, how does the chief justice in this area will authority . What tools do they have . The question is, in this era, as always, the chief justice, first and foremost, is of one ofnd steward our three branches of government. I think there are some unique aspects about that job, in the sense that the court is not a political branch. It was deliberately designed not to be. Has a difficult job, because im sure you have had heard this expression. He is they are the chief among equals. They cannot control the other justices. The power to cajole, but not control. Specifically, does the chief have a role in what cases are heard, and who writes the opinions . Elizabeth those are probably two of the exti