simply by taking the guns away from mass shooters before they commit mass shootings. it s not complicated. it s such an obvious solution that you had to think about why we weren t already doing that. who doesn t want to prevent mass shootings? only the gun lobby, everybody else cares about children. americans say they want red flag laws. why wouldn t they? like supporting black lives matter or fighting climate change or getting the covid shot or standing with the brave people of ukraine. red flag laws seem like one of the ideas that no decent person could possibly oppose. you want crazy people to have guns? of course you don t. who would? so naturally, you are for a red flag laws. you may soon get red flag laws across the country. what would that mean if we do? to things you should know. first, red flag laws will not end mass shootings. but red flag laws will end due process. due process is a simple concept but it s the key to everything good about america. in our system of j
by taking the gunsas away from mass shooters before they commit mass shootings. it s not complicated . in fact, it s such an obvious solution that you had to wonder why we weren twe already doing that . who does want w to prevent mass shootings? we re only a gun lobby everybody else cares about children. so a lototelar of americans not surprisingly now say they want red flag laws and why wouldn t they like supporting black lives matter fightingke climated change or getting the covidin svder standing with the brave people ofrave ukraine? red flag laws seem like one oft those ideas that no decent person could possibly oppose. you want crazy people to have guns. of course you don t. who would so naturally or for red flag laws and in fact we may soon get red flags acrossry the country. so what would that mean if we do? well, two things you should know. first, red flag laws f will not end mass shootings, but red flag laws will end due process. due processss is a simple concey ,b
actually hate violence. if you would do something about this and punish the people who are committing gun crimes. but no. they prevent you from defending your family and buying and holding guns. why is that? well, we don t need a guess because they re telling us. watch with the attorney general of the united states and this guy is the attorney general. he s more than a craven political act, he runs the doj. mr. merrick garland, the biggest threat facing the country today. the fbi s view, the top domestic violent extremist threat comes from racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists specifically those who advocate for the superiority of the white race. tucker: that s a total lie actually. we have numbers to prove it. but you know it s a lie, there is no justification, rationally, for what merrick garland just said. it s ridiculous, obvious or anybody living in a major city knows that. why did they keep telling you
lindsey graham, we actually hate violence. you would do something about this and a punish the people who are committing gun crimes. but no, they would prevent you from defending your family from buying or holdingur. why is that ? well, we don t need to guess because they re telling us watch what the attorney general of the united states and just this guy actually is the attorney general. he s more than a craven political act. he runs the doj.oj watch him describe mr merrick garland, atthe biggest threat facing this country today in the fbi s view, the top domestic violence extremist threat comes from racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists, specifically those who advocated for the superiority of the white race. that s just a totalke liehat actually . and we have numbers to prove it. but you know, it s why there s no justification rationally forj what merrick garland just said. it s ridiculous. it s an obvious untruth. majoryone living in a city knows that . so why do the
with. it the disparity with the large and small business do and in terms of the profit margins and i would think conservative would be in sync with this. ny put on the screen the affordable health care act that is renamed the unaffordable health care act. it is mandatory language. the president doesn t have the authority to do this, does he? it is the sheer optices of the disaster from the obama administration perspective. they are making the announcement in a holiday week and hoping that no one will notice. and second of all. it is a craven political act to wait until the midterm election. you raised something that is crucial. it is illegal. this is by man date and the idea that executive pi if at supercedes the provision shows