Page 8 - Creativity Machine News Today

Thaler v. Perlmutter, et al is challenging the premise that Copyright Office USCO does not register AI-generated content due because there is not a human author, using copyrighted materials to train AI may violate copyright, website terms of use terms prohibiting using AI generated content

Generative AI is becoming increasingly popular across various industries due to its ability to improve efficiency and creativity. Specifically, companies can use AI to generate...

Artificial intelligence will increasingly sound like us as it grows more sophisticated. Will we be able to resist falling for our computer programs? | 1843 magazine

AI patentability — do system inventors have to be human? Diego Black, partner at Withers & Rogers, dissects the much talked about topic.

The appreciation of works of art is subjective, which seems to guarantee no artist or piece is left out of realm of consumption. But, what happens to our understanding of art if artificial intelligence plays a more substantial role in its creation?

The U.S. Copyright Office has told a federal judge that artificial intelligence (AI) artwork can't be protected.

The U.S. Constitution provides the basis for copyright protection “by securing for limited times to authors . . . the exclusive right to their respective writings” in order “[t]o...

Stephen Thaler has filed suit against the U.S. Copyright Office, arguing that his A.I.-generated work should be covered by Copyright Law.

A computer scientist who is trying to obtain copyrights for his artificial intelligence (AI) system has taken his cased to a federal court.

Artificial intelligence can generate images within seconds, but AI-generated art has blurred the lines of ownership and heightened instances of bias.