actions might have caused harm to our national security. curiously, republicans on the hill aren t asking those same questions. in fact, most don t seem very fazed at all by this. the hypocrisy of folks in my party, that spent years spending wiping a server, are now out there defending a man who very clearly did not take the national security of the united states to heart, and will be up to the doj whether or not that reaches a level of indictment. but, this is disgusting, in my mind, and no president should act this way, obviously. it is disgusting. republicans are silent, because what trump did was wrong, and they know it. he potentially put the united states in danger, there is no doubt about it. and worse, he is still putting americans in danger, as the washington post reports, trump and his cronies have put rank and file civil servants in harm s way after the mar-a-lago search. attorney general garland faced online assassination threats, he decried the rising unfou
and his cronies have put rank and file civil servants in harm s way after the mar-a-lago search. attorney general garland faced online assassination threats, he decried the rising unfounded attacks on the fbi and the justice department in both of their agents. and now, the national archives, believe it or not, an agency most people have never heard of, have become a target of a rash of threats and vitriol. all of this, because of the records fight that is taking place with donald trump. honestly, what can we say anymore? republicans don t care about national security, that s the only way to say it. they don t care about the security of government officials. otherwise, they d be speaking out like congressman kinzinger. instead, they care about their own political prospects, and kissing the behind of a twice impeached disgraced former president. that is the grand old party, indeed. joining our jennifer reuben, an msnbc political analyst and opinion writer for the