Grade of good. The iihs looked at how these selfdriving systems perform in Monitoring Drivers and reminding them that they need to pay attention. Systems from tesla, mercedesbenz, and volvo were among 11 that the iihs rated as poor. Gm system rated as marginal, and nasas crew seven splashed down under a canopy of parachutes over the florida coast this morning. You see this early today, the spacex Crew Dragon Capsule could be seen streaking across the sky as it crossed over the midwest early today. The vessel successfully returned three astronauts and a cosmonaut after their six month stay on the International Space station. Welcome home. The next hour of Cnn News Central starts now. This is cnn Breaking News. Breaking news. Former Special Counsel robert hur will soon be on the hot seat on capitol hill, defending not only his decision not to charge President Biden for his handling of classified documents, but also why he described the president as an elderly man with a poor memory who c
Right . You would have a pretty good sense of what he was going to be asked and a pretty good sense of how he was going to answer it. None of this goes perfectly from a prosecutors perspective. Danny will tell you, none of this goes perfectly from the Defense Attorneys perspective. This is why you have redirect. This is why you have final arguments, this is why as danny said earlier, you keep a list of defenses and some fall out along the way and some get better. As much as you plan, you have to be flexible. Is the prosecution happy with the cross . If i were the prosecutor here and they wanted to spent 3 1 2 days saying the same thing, my view would be let him have it. Keep doing it. I think at some point, jose, youre losing your jury. I take anas point, sometimes you lose your jury, but you never try to. My goal is to never lose my jury. And if youre saying the same thing over and over for days on end, i think youre losing your jury. There is an agony in a crossexamining of a witness
alternative says to the extent that you think some of the cannot come in regardless of whether he testifies, some of it should be allowed, the remainder should be allowed as cross-examination material if he testifies so there are two separate issues before the judge. i do not think all of it will come in but there is so much cross-examination material, lead aside what is on this list, as you know from covering trump or his entire presidency, all of the lies he has told is also fodder for the cross- examination so i do not think the judge will allow all of it but this is one where, it is a sad state of affairs for our country, there is a embarrassment of riches here. on the bond trump has apparently posted in the ag s
witness stand in this case, and one of the reasons we know that is everything we are seeing on this list. however, the judge still has to make a ruling ahead of time for the defendant, if you do take the witness stand, i am going to allow them to bring up the e. jean carroll case or to bring up what you did to the clerk in the other case or to bring up the attorney general s case. will all of these survive as the district attorney wants them to, as possible avenues of attack of donald trump if he took the witness stand? i m sure donald trump well use whatever is allowed by the judge as cross-examination material as an excuse to say well, because the judge is allowing this, now i m not going to testify. he is never going to testify. it is really going to be the end of the road for him in this case. the prosecutors here are far too good and have way too much ammunition for that to ever be
lot of buzz around, you know, town, or with the president. you re not going to get that from him. he is a very careful person. that doesn t mean it doesn t exist. right. he is not going to reveal it. he is going to be very careful, and he was careful in the interview. he s not going to reveal anything that is actually confidential and should remain confidential. it doesn t mean it wasn t it is good for the investigation. it is not good for an obstruction of justice investigation, for your main witness or a primary witness to be writing a book. we hated when witnesses wrote books. that was the worst thing. that is just feeding a defense lawyer a whole litany of cross-examination material. but he is a careful, smart person. i think the reason why you re left wanting is actually intentional. what do you think? i wonder the same thing. interesting book. we were all combing through it to see if there was something about obstruction.