we had some of the same questions when we spoke to him. how many versions did it take to get to the story you just told, charles? what, three, four, five times, maybe? yes. i finally realized that the more i keep lying, i m just digging myself deeper and deeper. i m not gonna get out of it. and when i did finally start tellin the truths about things, i didn t feel comfortable revealing too much too soon because i didn t wanna be a part of the case to begin with. so once again i resorted to telling a lot of stories. the big picture here, charles, for a lotta people, is that is sounds like a crock. that a felon, just out of the slammer would hook up with a recently retired state police officer and do this gun exchange. it just doesn t seem to make sense. it doesn t pass the sniff test. there s a lotta things about this case that don t make sense. if i were you i would have alarms goin off inside my head. here you are, on probation, how do you know that this former cop is
that a felon, just out of the slammer would hook up with a recently retired state police officer and do this gun exchange. it just doesn t seem to make sense. it doesn t pass the sniff test. there s a lot of things about this case that doesn t make sense. if i were you i would have alarms going off inside my head. here you are, on probation, how do you know that this former cop is really a former cop and he s not setting you with a sting? although that did cross my mind and i had concerns about it, there was something about him if you ve spent anytime with mr. camm, he has a way of putting you at ease. he has a way of making you feel like he s legit and everything s okay. and plus i didn t care what the gun was for. you ve provided this former trooper with weapons, he was on a special weapons team with the indiana state police. he was s.w.a.t. so theoretically here, this premeditated crime, he s gonna trust a handgun that s come off the street that he hasn t checked out,
always your first suspect. their divorce had not been very pleasant. detectives questioned her ex-husband terry. terry was looked at by the police. they did take a dna sample. and it did cross my mind, what if terry did do this. you have to think about all the different possibilities, you know, could this person have done this? would they have done it? what would have been their reason to do it? when the results of terry s dna test came back from the lab it didn t match samples from the crime scene. police also found out he was nowhere near brit any s apartment at the time of the murder. his alibi was airtight. he really ended up not being much of a player in the case once they ruled him out. eldridge was cleared of any wrongdoing. norman clark had been questioned and released too. if police had any leads they were holding them close. i was curious why they were being so particularly tight-lipped about it. i think my primary concern was
covering murder investigations reporter jamie satterfield knew this one was a no-brainer. the husband who discovered his wife was having another man s baby was someone detectives needed to investigate. did you wonder immediately about brittany s ex-husband. you know, the ex-husband is always your first suspect. their divorce had not been very pleasant. detectives questioned her ex-husband terry. terry was looked at by the police. they did take a dna sample. and it did cross my mind, what if terry did do this. you have to think about all the different possibilities, you know, could this person have done this? would they have done it? what would have been their reason to do it? when the results of terry s dna test came back from the lab it didn t match samples from the crime scene. police also found out he was nowhere near brit any s apartment at the time of the murder. his alibi was airtight. he really ended up not being much of a player in the case
and one of the things that those girls all had in common was that they were all attractive and blond and white and didn t have any criminal record. and i guess i just kind of wonder whether police and everybody else would have start of stepped up their game a little bit if that had been the case here. yeah, that did cross my mind numerous times. but you know, you have to have faith in your law enforcement. if you don t have faith in your law enforcement to treat everybody equal, then what do you have? reporter: what you have in dan valdez s case is a search you do yourself. as spring turned to summer that