Not discussing a transition, and if he thinks hes going to be part of that future. Its not going to happen. The people who are the opponents of this regime will never, ever stop. They will be an insurgency at least and worse potentially even than a civil war if it continues, because they will not stop. Now we also are not out of options with respect to what we may be able to do to increase the pressure and further change the calculation. And i think weve made that clear to the Russian Foreign minister and others. Nor are the other players short of an ability to be yet to have an impact here. So i think they can bolster, they can protest, they can put out distortions. At the bottom line is we are going to geneva to implement jimmy fell one. And if assad doesnt do that he will invite greater response in various ways for various people over a period of time. So im not particularly surprised that hes trying to divert this, hes been doing this for months to make himself the protector agains
Between 2000 and three and 2006 were not only the difficulties in toronto but a packed was developed between the hardliners and the hardliners in washington who fed off of each other and ended up in the situation. That ended up with president khatami being replaced by president ahmadinejad. The United States helped to produce that situation. Lastly, may i ask a question that follows on from the previous question . Will the foreign secretary make it clear to the americans that if Prime Minister netanyahus efforts at the United States Congress Prevent president obama from continuing with the negotiations, the uk, germany, france and the eu will have to detach themselves from america and reach their own conclusions, along with other members of the p5 . I am grateful for the right honorable gentlemans remarks and i agree very much about the importance of maintaining momentum. It was possible to see that even over the past two weeks. The 10day gap between the negotiations that took place tw
Transitions and segues from one issue to another, even though they werent in the same order he would have wanted them to be taken up. Decisiondable care act almost looks like the cards were shuffled, in the sense that he was able to form one majority on the Commerce Clause issue and then segue to the taxing power issue. It shows an enormous skill in counting to five and seeing what positions he can espouse that will get him to victory, even if its a small or incremental steps. Its very effective and will continue to be. The only other big thing that is tote dramatic if you come the court, i will show you around. The remarkable thing is to look three women. See left, center, and right on the court. It has had a tremendous effect on the court as well. Mayor are and soto very forceful justices. Theyre both going to make it difference over time. Sotomayor still thinks she is on a threemember court, which she was on the Second Circuit, because she tries to dominate the argument with questio
Of the campaignfinance world which many people in this town care about very intensely and other people in the country dont. Other than they see headlines and president obama at the state of the union criticizing the Supreme Court. They got that buzz, but i dont think many people understood it. Lay a candor, i will marker around this discussion. I wont try to get into the discussion. 441 b the parties debate that. Lets talk about the court and how they look a Campaign Finance and what this may mean in terms of how they approach some of these cases. The commentary on the case some of them is trying to tear it up as a citizens united. A bedrock campaignfinance decision from the 1970s may be in some danger based on the march of cases waste on the past few cycles where the court has been First Amendment protected and been willing to strike down campaignfinance or strictures. Today have cases been on the expenditure side. This is a contribution limit case in what is going on is Sean Mccutche
I thought, i can go out. I can go to a restaurant in new york or and antique shop. I used to worry about going into the rock into the white house. It was really the happiest time of my life. Going to the white house and she found out they were the happiest times of her life. Sheere is the case where had a much different impact as first lady. May not have been the ones that people thought about at the time. You suggest she was a transformational first lady and set the stage where those to follow. How so . Away her generation was a bridge between traditional wives and mothers and the post womens liberation of the modern era. Ast is exactly how she was first lady. There were traditional first ladys receding her and afterwards, they were much more modern, still partners with their husbands and picking a particular policy to work on. Kennedy tapesine are widely available. You can listen to her own voice wonderful. Everyone should have it. Thanks to both of you for being at the table tonight