Page 2 - Daca Case News Today

Universe saying the world is one way and it isnt. before we go, those not taken care of in their town, city, their school, many are under the impression if we build a wall or are anti-immigrant, more money will go to them. given whats currently going on there are still billions and billions of dollars going to the border. its just not being spent well. isnt that the case? >> exactly. exactly. and, remember, i mentioned the gang of eight bill, immigration bill in 2013 that had $46 billion in bord...

The daca program. >> yeah. one of the things donald trump said when he was running was that he would be supportive of the dreamers and instead he has made their lives even more difficult than they were before. so, i hope the supreme court can see it in the law to make sure that we protect them. 90% of the american people believe they should have a pathway to citizenship. and notwithstanding that, the trump white house left them out of their immigration plan because they said it would be too divi...

Appeal over the daca case. this is the so-called dreamers case. this is for young people brought to the united states by their parents and have been allowed to stay in the country, an obama administration program. remember, president trump tried to shut it down. and that effort has been blocked by the lower courts and thats what the trump administration has appealed and today the supreme court said it would take up those appeals. that means that its not going to hear this case until the fall and...

This has been a very big deal. this is a case that comes from montana, a state program that was set up, if you contribute to a scholarship fund and the money could be used for parents who want to send their children to private schools but the state said you cant use the money for religious schools because of the state constitution. the supreme court will hear that appeal. one other thing here, the supreme court has turned down an appeal in an abortion case. this was from alabama. it would have b...

Those should come down tomorrow. then jim and poppy, one other thing weve been waiting for, for a while, the decision on daca. of course, the trump administration has been wanting to wind down the daca program that was enacted by president obama that really protects about 700,000 dreamers. these are the undocumented immigrants who came here to the united states as children. the trump administration wanting to winds down the program. the lower courts have been putting that on hold, not letting th...

The policy while the lower court challenges play out through the federal courts of appeal. the earliest the supreme court could take this case now is next term. the term that begins in october. so if the case comes back to the supreme court and if they decide to take it, then the earliest that this could be changed is for perhaps at least a year or so. so the military will have another year or so to go ahead and enforce this policy and they are now saying that they will do so. that they believe ...

Cave. >> really quick, either he is showing he is willing to give, or perhaps he has even forgotten himself the various sequence of events that have, you know, happened, leading up to this, because some of the overtures that he is willing to make today, reportedly, seem to be overtures that have already been made, whether they were failed, or offered some incentives. >> exactly. i mean there was a broader version of the deal that was offered a year ago in the previous shutdown impasse. but vice ...

Obstructionist and that will help him. he always said he preferred the senate plan to his own plan. i dont think that will happen but i think you will hear the words infrastructure frequently. >> immigration? >> what is the question? >> the question is, is that there is a deal to be made and in this case theres a very easy deal to be made on dreamers if he wants to and if the democrats want to? >> if he wants to. that would be the narrowest of deals. the doj just filed the supreme court take up ...

Or at the very least, constitutional determinations of the type we are seeing in this daca case. they should be referred to the appellate judges, three-judge panel or maybe an on banc panel of the whole court. they are far more knowledgeable on constitutional knowledgeable on constitutional and all these matters. the tyranny especially of the district court bench has to end. the peoples will should no longer be held hostage to the capricious whims of one ill-equipped disgruntled life tenured jur...

Way to impact the daca case. perhaps hes figured out here that having public statements could harm an ultimate position in litigation with stormy daniels, whether thats in court or in some form of adjudication thats outside of the public eye. in addition, its got to be awfully difficult for the president to counterpunch with a wife and a family at home. and those sorts of family sensitivities may have given him the impetus to remain quiet. >> philip on a broadcast you are frequently a congress o...