Page 3 - Darius Khambata News Today

India News: Learn about the recent ruling by the Bombay High Court regarding granting music licenses and copyright infringement. Find out the implications for copyright owners and the importance of obtaining licenses.

On the occasion of completing two decades since its inception, Naik Naik & Co. celebrated the milestone by inaugurating a new office space situated on the first floor of B-Wing at Mittal Towers,...

In a significant order, the Bombay High Court has held that music rights holders like Phonographic Performance Ltd and Novex are copyright owners and can issue music licenses even if they are not...

Several members of the judicial fraternity and the film industry marked their presence at the event.

Kotak Securities has also made Sebi a party in the case. The division bench of Justice GS Kulkarni and Justice Jitendra Jain has allowed all the respondents to file their responses in the case and has posted the hearing for January 16. As per the courts website, Kotak Sec filed the case on November 24.

Nominal Index [Citation 553 - 619]The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation v. UoI 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 553Shonali Kedar Dighe v. Ashita Tham and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 554Anuradha Kapoor and Ors....

Nominal Index [Citation 301 – 619]Bina Saxena w/o Late Ravendra Kumar Saxena v. Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 301Hemant Dhirajlal Banker v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 302CIT v. M/s...

Nominal Index [Citation 577 - 591]Dadaso Balaso Awad and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 577Nita Narendra Nadgouda v. M/s. Garuda Carriers and Shipping (P) Ltd. and Ors. 2023...

The Bombay High Court upheld the arbitrators decision to deny Max Healthcare Institute interim relief in its plea to halt the sale of Care Hospitals to Blackstone Group. Max Healthcare claimed exclusivity in deal negotiations with Care Hospitals but alleged a violation by the owners.

The Calcutta High Court, in the prolonged legal battle over Priyamvada Devi Birlas estate, ruled against granting full powers to the administrator pendente lite (APL) committee. The court clarified that the APL committee can only exercise powers held by Priyamvada Birla during her lifetime, focusing solely on her shares.