Would want to take advantage of. Supervisors farrell . Supervisor mark farrell thank you. I want to thank you for your hard work. In terms of this legislation, very conflicting points of view of view from my perspective and i hear from my neighbors and other neighbors in the city that there are people already living in these units. I will say out right that i disagree with parts of this legislation particularly with the cost past through and the mergers and the ability or lack thereof. In court what has been in my head is what we are doing principally to talk about by supervisor yee and tang and i appreciate supervisor wiener for taking out some of that language. I do know we see families leaving and we have families that cannot afford to stay here and there are families looking for certain kinds of stock in this city. If this does too well that we start to lose our pure single families in our neighborhood. The beauty in our city is about our neighborhoods and diversity of our differen
Were here in planning and the sfmta theyll try to claim their Illegal Police radio negative gaits the practice under sequa preposterous reduce. We know the truth a backed up of activists blocked the buses and they settled for a firestorm of political pressure that made the project be pushed without sequa review. The impact of the private buses are real and they should be studied the cancer risks with dies dieselier than the foreheads talk about. Their white washing entire Community Everybody whoet not making 200,000 a year and while the market rate is costly the political opposition those of us who fight for san franciscans the rendered and the seniors and people with disabilities working people the the Lgbt Community the young people we are strong. clapping. thank you. Again i would remind the members of the public we have a rule in the Board Chamber not to express clear expression. Thank you jessica with the senior and disability action we port this today were concerned about Pedestr
Thank you very much. Spirsz im keri im a staff with the 10 to one im here to admit a wrong im one of the unfortunate souls that parked on sutter and jeopardizing in 2011, i had a bus pull up behind me i did my best to get out of the way not knowing what was going to happen a couple of weeks later i got a ticket in the mail saying i had to pay 265 recognizing i did the wrong thing i paid the ticket. Come to find out the google bus the city cut a deal for one dollar per stop thats not fair if we dont make a change where the public is went theres a lot of anger pointed out at the politicians in the city i urge you to look at the system and try to figure out a way to move working people around the region and the method doing thats fair. Thank you ted with the San Francisco Tenants Union we support this from the data that was seen its clear and a direct correlations related to those google bus stops its time we give up to ask the Tech Industry to mitigate the damage. There causing us to be
To not express either support or opposition to statements. If there is going to be a statement that everyone disagrees with ora an agrees with. We pause your time. Back to you. Thank you. At the same time, that the city is performing a ceqa exemption, the city is preparing a full Environmental Impact report for munis transit efficiency tax project. Muni has to do a full eir. When google wants to run illegal pilot shuttle there is no review at all. Environmental review, ceqa review is required to analyze what are the impacts of this in terms of pedestrians, damage to our streets, in terms of Bicycle Safety and diesel emissions and what are the measures to reduce those impacts. Can require nondiesel buses and those that dont interfere with bicycle lanes and pedestrians. Can we require funding for low and moderate Income Housing. These are all alternatives that would be analyzed in a ceqa eir and what this city is bypassing completely. That is illegal. Class 6, it says its limited to basi
Hundred stops it includes buses stopping at the 2 hundred stops and collecting people. So how is that a project that be only involves Data Collection . The buses that are stopping at the up to two hundred locations are already doing so from our purposes the project were analyzing for the affects e effects is the spooks of the involved changes to the continues the sequa review is that the aspect thats involving change to existing conditions. Were elevated the project opposed by sfmta. Its up to the project sponsor to define what the project entails we then review that and the approving body approves the body as going through the public review theres 2 hundred stops proposed correct . No specific stops are proposed under the pilot. Oh, okay. Are are there stops that are currently not being used for theyre not shuttles but could actually be new stops under the pilot. We have no basis for this assumption and that gets to the issue at hand the reasons that mta is undertaking those they have