Page 85 - Data Mining News Today

>> this is a dragnet. its an overreach. and we have got to find out why this is justified simply because of the nsa wants to do some data mining. >> interesting. the president is here in palm springs now for a mini summit with his chinese counterpart. is he supposed to be pressing, among other things about chinese cyber attacks. that conversation now might get a bit awkward for the u.s. side. shep? >> it might be dripping all over the place in irony. ed henry in palm springs with the president w...

The founders wrote out. they can make whatever laws they want, but i wonder, judge napolitano says this has no hope of standing the test of the constitution. but you dont know when youre the victim. >> i suspect that -- actually, was reading today -- i cant remember -- a 1979 court tase -- i remember -- if i make a call to you ask that record is held by a third party, namely the phone company, that we have no presumption of privacy and that is governments business. so the supreme court has said ...

I think it is important to recognize that you cant have 100% security, and also then have 100% privacy and zero in convenience. >> this is a drag net, it is an overreach and we have to find out why this is justified simply because the nsa wants to do some data mining. >> president obama with a strong endorsement of sweeping survailience programs. but continued criticism of one of the authors of the patriot act. time to bring in our panel. tucker carlson of "fox and friends weekend". and as you h...

Cant just idly sift through the data. you cant take the data and run it through a computer to do so-called data mining. you have to wait until you have a specific need before you can dip into the database. >> and i guess the question most people ask at that point is, can the government with that information, that database, that bank of information, can they translate that into wiretapping? can they find out once they know a phone call was made from "a" to "b" for a certain time, for how long, ca...

Acting like this much to do about nothing and we didnt know about it! >> i dont think lindsey graham is saying much to do about nothing. i think he is saying what i said to you yesterday. if youre not reading about recipes for homemade bombs, dont worry about it. >> the irs will not audit you and try to destroy you if youre trying to set up a conservative organization. why not conflate the two stories? >> anti-terror agencies are not the irs. >> you dont think they can be abused? >> i dont want ...

Under this presidents watch, weve got the irs targeting individual americans and groups that are expressing their views. when you have this stack of all these things that make us distrust the government more and the presidents excuses i didnt know about it until he read about it in the newspaper. then we wants us to trust us when we find out phone conversations and internet is being tracked by some giant --. >> megyn: the president made two comments. his comments were off point. he set up a stra...

I could eat that all day long. you dont want peanut butter? >> i love peanut butter. >> dig it, girl. >> nancy grace talks to me about her trip behind bars. hour two. thanks for staying with me. im brooke baldwin. a lot of folks very upset this afternoon about a new revelation about government spying. a lot of folks defending this. a new report suggests records of phone calls handled by verizon and possibly every phone calling, period, are being funneled into the files of the top secret govern...

>> more important than that -- let me say this. >> go. >> do we trust the government? i dont. look at how theyve been monitoring the associated president and other news organizations. look at how the irs used information to target americans. so why then all of a sudden would i trust the government with my cell phone records to not abuse that power and target individuals maybe they dont like. >> julie -- go ahead. jump in. also answer this, then what should our expectation of privacy be? >> well,...

Versa. >> i think the left didnt like it under bush. they dont like it now. that is not really surprising. i didnt have a problem with it under bush. i dont have a problem with it now as long as it is done through the fisa court which was candidate obamas position and there has to be in oversight. it cant just be done without any kind of oversight. as for gores complaint, blanket surveillance, what kind of surveillance do you expect them to do? they dont know who the terrorists are. that is why ...

To be sharing these records as long as the government is only looking at suspected terrorists and people that they believe are speaking to terrorists. >> megyn: it was not clear at one point, it sounded like it was going to land on you. >> i was not being surveilled upon. >> megyn: i do want to clarify, is collecting the phone records -- barack obama back in 2008 was listening, wiretaps. that is different. that is not what were talking about as far as we know right now. >> reporter: right. also,...