But. Host and every get the opportunity to go to College Campus this to talk with professors who are authors today were on uh campus of claremont california enjoined by professor ralph rossum who is author of the book understanding Clarence Thomas the jurisprudence of constitutional restoration ralph rossum what in your view is the biggest misconception of Clarence Thomas . Guest that somehow he was the Justice Scalia the shoeshine boy that it was put after his confirmation he is his own man. I had a chance to f few years ago i a admire him enormously and in fact, they have asked me to do and after words for the book combined into a paperback edition. And thomas having done a book on him in his more profound and consistent and is a giant he is not as with teeth or sarcastic but he gives as. One of the things that he does is that each but he will assign a clark or to sell one he has the research looking at an enormously amount new cannot sell of the things that you want to say without l
Data i have this pattern. I wont know until this runs until the end of 15 after 3 years of data. I need 36 months of Historical Data to tell you how the house is operating. Any other questions . I just wanted to point out the acos are doing a great job on utilization. But part of the equation in total cost is unit cost and we have as we understand from blue shield some very Large Organizations that are renewing for 1115. This organization for blue shield is renewing for 15 with new contracts. So it doesnt get credit for all the work hes doing. Hes been very aggressive to work with the partners to ensure the unit cost is also going to be something we can sustain for 2015. Its based on also his work with the associations that we partner with. We are still in a two horse race. Blue shield and kaiser. Any questions . Any other questions . This is a discussion item. So, thank you very much. Any Public Comment on this item . Seeing none. Item no. 6. Also in item no. 6 there is a substitute,
Fully funded on the idnr and fully funded on the contingency . Yes. Congratulations. I was wrong. I voted for it. The question i have is if we have funded the i dnr and contingency reserve because the premiums were higher in the beginning because we had to establish that . Its possible. Yes. Im looking at it fwr that perspective. Im not saying im happy with five. You dont need the cash buildup or the Balance Sheet from the ibnr. Its all paid claims and i have to tweak it and do my stuff and now that we know all this. A lot of what we have to do in 15 is predicated upon experience which we dont know. Why i say all this stuff is that we be the bet ahead of the curve with the data i have this pattern. I wont know until this runs until the end of 15 after 3 years of data. I need 36 months of Historical Data to tell you how the house is operating. Any other questions . I just wanted to point out the acos are doing a great job on utilization. But part of the equation in total cost is unit co
It was on the minds of some of the Founding Fathers. On september 5, 1787, at the constitutional convention, they were discussing the public land related authorities in the constitution, including the authority that has now been included in whats often referred to as the enclave clause, article 1, 78 clause 17. Wufl delegates to the one of the delegates, elbridge garrett, a delegate from massachusetts stood before the convention and made an astute observation. There gary said this power, that is the power of congress over federal public lands might be made use of to enslave any particular state by buying up its territory and that the strong holds proposed would be a means of aweing the state into undue obedience into the general government. Close quote. Then as now wise observes often came from the state of massachusetts. Then as now, we have a grave risk associated with the fact that when the federal government owns this much land, the federal government has this much power and it was
The hospital. Can i make a request that we get a better system. My question is what is the structure that alliance their incentives with ours . They have acl claims targets that we fund. We set a certain amount of fundings that is a claims target and that is adjusted for certain anticipated to bring the cost down for standard studies for this set of risk. So i work with them and we agree that is hhs and with their actuarial people, if you hit these thresholds you will get a certain amount of money. Its fairly complex. Is it a with hold on the capitation . No. I dont know if we could as a trust do it that way, but its literal additional bonus. If they go below this, thats how. There is a massive amount because they are driven to hit these targets. These are in here . She is saying no, but we have actually, can i say, when we price the product, the spread in here, i didnt add the claims target as part of the idnr reserve. But the difference between the premium, we actually with hold that