Each new track brings its own unknown danger is. According to the dr as they have never been any deaths but many injuries. Each one of them except its the risks as an occupational hazard. To drive this on a fixed salary with an added bonus is if they manage to transport more wood than expected. Its not looking promising for todays bonus. The bulldozer driver brings back bad news the road is an accessible unless the drive is used this technique. Nicknames the come to. Live you since return journey promises to be event. Will take on the same routes in the opposite direction tony noted transporting the giant wood logs to the river bank. Live. Live. Live. Live. It were human obviously you know the guys who made a point but. What. Are you going out about. This looks a little evil man. Lets. Listen to something. Live. Even on the most dangerous jonny use of things have his family at some 5000 kilometers away in indonesia. And. Let. Up on the mighty one. How much. Of. That. Cut. To days journ
Who run the House Oversight and titled the hearing kids in cages Inhumane Treatment at the border thats an indictment of the trumpet ministrations family separation policy everyone seems to agree theres a crisis at the border with republicans saying its the pressure of immigrants coming to the u. S. And democrats saying its the detention policy itself. The name also expresses the outrage over what democrats described as jails for children we are creating the generation of children theyll never forget what we did say that this type of trauma can go away some republicans push back i am frustrated with the title of the hearing it is a hearing in titled kids in cages. What we say and i personally we use matters ive been to the border many times and to this day ive never seen a kid in a cage a former immigration and Customs Enforcement chief says it is unfair to blame immigration agencies coping with this surge of Central American immigrants fleeing violence and poverty if you dont reduce t
A resolution but it will be published as an official document of the Uns Human Rights Council activists say its a good sign but chinas government has long stood defiant against foreign criticism katia locus of the young aljazeera is going to talk on and weigh in hey whos joining us live from beijing so has there been any response from the Chinese Government yet way. Yes well we just a short time ago heard from the ministry of Foreign Affairs in a regular daily Media Briefing the spokesman predictably i guess was dismissive of this letter signed by 22 countries saying it was an attempt to politicize the issue of human rights the spokesman also said that this was a domestic affair and it was not up to anyone outside of china to comment on the situation in genk he also pointed out that there have been no terrorist attacks in the area for the past 2 years evidence he says that this is working remembering that the government in china says these are not the Tension Centers theyre vocational
Them were muslim majority nations which is really quite telling because china is using their pocketbook to gain influence in many of these nations as well. China defends the practice the government says its not about eliminating peoples identity but about teaching employment skills and pushing out what it calls extremism year far surely by seizing up locational education and Training Centers in accordance with the law we aim to education save those who were influenced by religious extremism and committed to mine it legal or fix it. The letter is not tied to a vote or a resolution but it will be published as an official document of the Uns Human Rights Council activists say its a good sign but chinas government has long stood defiant against foreign criticism katia locus of the young aljazeera. Is in beijing to tell us how the chinese are reacting. Chinas ministry of Foreign Affairs has responded to the letter signed by 22 countries regarding the situation in shin jang province and pred
A vent to present their own status as being the Innocent Party as being innocent as being the ones in the right so so i think its not particularly surprising that there would be 2 different types of stories but if we look at what what has happened in the in the long long history of the strait of hormuz particularly in recent decades we know that there have been routine threats from iran to close the strait of hormuz we know of iran has attacked various ships going back to the iran iraq war in the 1980 s. So we know that there is a modus operandi in operation here so i think whilst its contested was the iranians have denied it it seems relatively obvious that there is some type of subterfuge going on here there is some type of complicity involved involving the Iranian Revolutionary guard corps so are you saying that this is the retaliation that the iranians had threatened because iran has been threatening to retaliate since british marines seized that Iranian Oil Tanker and waters. Last