works. greta: i found it interesting that the jury seized upon that. i wondered if i was being hypertechnical about the law? no. a big part of the prosecution s case was chloroform. i was easy, in my opinion, to discredit and give it no value and no weight. once you got rid of that i m not saying there wasn t some sort of nobody knows what happened to caylee. i don t think chloroform was involved. i think they tried to make a strong case. but the chloroform seemedesque enough to move it aside. once that is gone, you don t have much to work with. greta: what do you think was the purpose of the chloroform? chloroform, i think maybe they had a feeling there was some sort of, you know, like trying to keep caylee quiet or something to that effect. they found the chloroform searches.
throwing caylee s remains in the woods near their home. their lawyer on the record. what do you advise your clients at this point? they are obviously not the defendants. but they ve gone through a horrible situation, with their child and grandchild. how do you advise them to get their lives back in order? certainly, there s lots of decisions that need to be made. neither one or any can go back to their mundane lives of the day-to-day grind that we all go through many cindy can t go back to being a nurse. george can t go back into security or law enforcement. this case has destroyed their lives. as you can imagine just starting out they have to start out all over again and figure out where they are gonna go. greta: are they willing to have her come back home or are things too raw now? those are things i can t talk about it is attorney/client
an accident that is snowballed out of control. it is out of control. it is out of control right now. and it has been out of control since the moment this trial began. since the moment this case began. it is out of control. and it is true, casey made some bad decisions. but it and started this, but it doesn t have to be continued. it doesn t have to be presented this way. this case does not have to come out this way. the truth stops here. the truth stars here. the nonsense stops right starts here. the nonsense stops right now. it should have stopped the moment you all raised your hands and chose to be jurors in this case and took that oath. every single thing, all of that nonsense should have stopped. greta: straight ahead, can you imagine what life is like for the anthonys? or what dinner will be like at
been discussed which is why a lot of us lost sleep because we had no way to everything we were trying to process. everything we saw everyday, it want easy. greta: i often hear jurors have several rounds of votes, sometimes they only have one. what happened when the door closed and you were in the room, take me through the deliberation process. after the foreperson was selected, we wanted to gauge if people were on one side or another. we started there. there were two people initially who thought definitely, first degree. at the same time, they did admit they felt it. and they just felt like it wasn t substantiated. they wanted to convict, but they admitted there is not enough evidence to prove that even though i strongly believe it. it started there and then it half and half. manslaughter and not guilty that was based slowly on the evidence we had to based
you are thinking about it. working midnight, weekends. they never see the build-up. it is extraordinarily hard work. i think it is noble work. noble for prosecutors and defense attorneys. thank you. greta: even though you had some disappointment you ought to be proud. we are very proud. greta: casey anthony didn t testify. were you ready for her testimony? did you expect she might? we did. after the opening statement we expected her to, as the trial wore on, we became more and more convinced she wouldn t. linda was prepared to examine her effectively. prepared to cross-examine her effectively. she never got the chant. greta: did you ever have any interaction with casey?