Page 9 - Dca Case News Today

Filed in court asking to delay a trial on trump university until after the inauguration, and asking that trump does not have to testify in person in this ca case, and rather that he be allowed to use the videotaped testimony. and this trial was set to begin on september 28th, and now trumps lawyers are asking for a postpone umt to 2017. >> you have the aear to the ground,le hally, and you have info and data on a call from trump and john kasich. >> yeah, you scared me with the setup, richard, tha...

With this station including making a lot of complaints regarding race and other things and they say he opened fire shooting and killing two people while they were on air. alison parker, 24 years old, the reporter. adam ward, the photojournalist. he was engaged to a young woman who also worked at the station. she was in the control room. she would have watched and heard the gunshots that ended up killing the love of her life. parker was dating an anchor at the station. he later tweeted out that t...

Asking for leniency. but it didnt seem to matter. the judge went by the book telling the mandating sentences that go with the crime. 45 years in jail. >> 45 years for the lives he took. >> that was not enough. all of the victims -- my sister is gone. it just wasnt enough. >> prosecutors wanted the family wanted. >> we believe nothing short of alliance is necessary in this ca case. >> we cant bring any of them back. you cant heal the hurt. >> reporter: so where do the men and women go from here? ...

Consider the options at 7-eleven. >> is the ability to buy contraceptives that are now widely available. my lord, all you have to do is walk into a 7-eleven or any shop on any street in america and have access to them. is that right to access those and have them paid for? is that such a towering good that it would suffocate the rights of conscience? i dont think so. but i hope the supreme court agrees. >> cardinal timothy dolan explaining on cbs that 7-eleven is really all we need to take care o...

So if i also were to accept the orders and go to the graduate course, effectively i would be off of the case in june, due to all the administrative requirements associated with moving and going to the course. whereas by resigning, im able to stay in the military for an additional six months. as of 26 august, 2014, im not only off of mr. muhammads defense team, but im also kicked out of the army. >> major jason wright quit. he resigned from the u.s. army in order to stay on this case just to you ...

Class. what do you do when faced with a conflict of interest, do i choose to forego the interest of my client or do i choose to fulfill the interest of another organization or entity? >> the army informed major wright this year that he needed to healeave his client and go b to the states, he asked the army for a deferral for a year to continue in this case. this time they said no. so now he faces this dilemma, accept the orders or quit. what would you do if it was your choice? >> march 26 of 201...

Hes up against in this case, they are trying to pull him off the case midstream. >> whenever someone takes an obligation to represent a client, especially in a capital case, you have to see it through. when congress envisioned, they said you have a duty to do and thats to zealousy defend your client. when you take that obligation on, you dont take it on without seeing it to its conclusion. having been on the case for several years, i have a legal and ethical duty to see it through. this is irres...

Sheikh muhammad, mastermind of 9/11. that predicament i just described is what his u.s. military lawyer is facing. jayson wright has been assigned to represent khalid sheikh muhammad. in the u.s. justice system, every defendant has the right for a defense. hes represented khalid sheikh muhammad for three years now, but hes been told that he can no longer serve on the defense. he needs to drop out of the case and return home to the u.s. to attend a year-long graduate course thats required of all ...

Of who i am in this country? but violate other legal mandates and protections i thought i had? i think thats the real concern here, and i think in fairness the court was aware of that when this case was argued, that it really doesnt just unsettle the narrow question of the contraception mandate, i think it unsettles an awful lot of presumptions we have about the law. >> and the extent of -- the extent to which we can apply our own concerns and restrictions and fears to people around us without t...

Of how he decided the legislative prayer case earlier this year, the town of grief case with huge regard for the faith of believers and sort of subordinating the objections of others, its tempting to say he may vote with the conservative wing this time. >> if that happens. and i realize the way that happens could happen in lots of different ways. the ruling could be narrowly construed. talking about the contraception part of it. i know that some democrats in congress today were making noise that...