Page 154 - Debunked News Today

Directly receiving donations from people that were very interested in this deal being approved. i think we need to take a step back and let the justice department do its job. if its going to do its job as attorney general sessions promised. they need to investigate this. they need to move forward. they need to hear what the informant is going to say. they need to look at the troves of documents that this informant has retained and will be willing to share with congress in order to answer some of...

Controverted by, you know, press reports. i mean, what was -- what is she talking about? >> yeah. its certainly not the way that i recall it. look, you know, the book came out in april of 2015. the uranium one story we shared before the book became public with the investigative unit at the "new york times." they ran a 4,000 word front page piece confirming the findings, the hidden donations, the cfius approval, the clintons connection to this drama. really after the book came out, judge, the fbi...

Republican? rachel: a lot of senators you see on the list are people though ho have been wrangling with the president. you have to wonder if the president regrets a little bit his strategy with them. sometimes you get a little more with honey than vinegar. ed: remember john mccain with the thumbs down on healthcare. you could see him going that way on taxes. pete: if your legacy has been i ran for president as standard bearner 2008. he ran on tax cuts. ed: he ran on repealing and replacing obama...

Controverted by, you know, press reports. i mean, what was -- what is she talking about? >> yeah. its certainly not the way that i recall it. look, you know, the book came out in april of 2015. the uranium one story we shared before the book became public with the investigative unit at the "new york times." they ran a 4,000 word front page piece confirming the findings, the hidden donations, the cfius approval, the clintons connection to this drama. really after the book came out, judge, the fbi...

Was controverted by press reports. what is she talking about? >> yeah, it certainly is not the way i recall it. look, you know, the book came out in april of 2015. the uranium one story we shared before the book came public with the investigative unit at the "new york times." they ran a 4,000-word front-page piece confirm firming the findings, -- confirming the findings, the hidden donations, the signatureious approval and the clintons connection to this drama. the f.b.i. launched an investigati...

To do is send out these questions and got hair-raising replies from his sources about collaboration between trump people and russians, some of them intelligence people and say he forwarded this to the fbi and hoped they would investigate. and when they didnt, in his view he became increasingly kind of impatient. and eventually, in about the autumn of 2016, that relationship broke down. >> yeah, and you said you believe its credible. why so? and even some of the salacious parts of it, because if ...

Him. does he defend the dossiers accuracy? >> yes, what his associates say, he believes its between 70 and 90% accurate. in other words, no intelligence document is perfect. humans are flawed. they get things wrong, sources make mistakes, this is the intelligence, and what he was trying to do is send out these questions and got hair-raising replies from his sources about collaboration between trump people and russians, some of them intelligence people and say he forwarded this to the fbi and hop...

>> jesse: tell me what you think about the sleight-of-hand where she says this has been debunked in the press. >> greg: there are people in the press who say there is no "there" there, some people on this very network have said it. we can question, is it normal for russian companies to give to american charities? ive never heard about this. yes, its perfectly okay but this is kind of the first time ever ever heard. they gave 150 million to the clinton foundation. doesnt that ring any bells? if y...

She had a proxy that signed off on it. it wasnt her that signed off on it. its difficult how you can orchestrate a conspiracy with nine other agencies. >> there are lot of things to criticize. >> be i the way, this was barack obamas administration, an administration that in many quarters had a hostility towards hillary clinton. in fact, a lot of people very close to the checkpoints as we all know had a hostility towards the clintons and if -- >> i think -- >> it wasnt an inside game, anybody tha...

Party needs a win. and many democrats are licking their chops at some of the things in this bill that they want to run against next year. who is rate? we may not know until 2018. >> i want to interrupt with some breaking news just into cnn. new developments in the russia investigation and that controversial dossier, some of which has been corroborated by u.s. intelligence officials, other parts have been debunked, a lot of other parts still up in the air. lets get right to cnns manu raju. manu, ...