So, just to be clear, what youre saying is twoyear extension. And that twoyear mark, if think didnt make that twoyear mark, theyd have to come back to the Planning Commission . Correct. Correct. Within that interim period, theyd update the design, work with staff on the design and come back as an informational item. Are you asking specifically that it go to the commission or preservation staff . Preservation staff. Staff, yeah. I would, i would actually suggest that you make that a joint discussion. On the informational item . Maybe if i may, one possibility would be to ask that the Architectural Review Committee of the hpc redo it rather than a right, thank you, thats perfect. So, i would move that. Ill second it. Commissioner antonini. Im fine with the motion. Just the clarification that we would get an informational presentation with the architectural renderings once theyre agreed upon between project sponsor and hpc architectural and planning staff, i think, in conjunction. Im told
You to consider whether these feed need to be considered under the current rules as opposed to deferred. One might argue the original entitlement should be brought forth to current rules as well. Thats probably a legal determination. Thank you. Sue hester. You have my letter from a week ago about this project, again about these fees. Its unusual. I dont think i have ever said i agree with robert her, the shorenstein group at the the same hearing. [laughter] i have history going back with Robert Shorenstein a long time. So, the noticing process really needs adjustment. If its not broken already. If people that really are developers and paying attention dont get any notice, i dont understand that. Its one thing for me not to get a notice. When people like that dont get a notice, i think you pay attention. I can just eat dirt. But apart from that what peter said is absolutely correct. You have the ability to not approve the projects. These are discretionary actions that youre being asked
Please go to room 421 and well make sure you will have an opportunity to speak for whatever item you are interested in. Well keep that area open. The presiding officer is chris fung, and we have commissioner honda and hurtado. At the controls is the boards legal assistant victor pacheco. Im cynthia goldstein, the director. Corey tooeg is here the acting and zone k administrator and representing the Planning Department and Planning Commission commission and joseph duffy representing the department. The clerk the board request that you turn off all cell phones and pagers. The Department Representative an 7 minutes for each case. People affiliated with their party must conclude their comments in the 7minute period. Those not affiliated with the parties have up to 3 minutes. Members of the public who wish to speak on an item are asked, but not required to submit a speaker card when you come up to the podium. Speaker cards are on the left side of the podium. There is Customer Satisfaction f
Apportioned building to a building that was right next to it on Mission Street. I thought that looked very, very well. Ive also been told this is a done deal by a lot of the people ive spoken to already. And id like to think that that is certainly not the case. And im hoping that you will reconsider and keep your approval of course to the original project okay, thank you, maam. Your time is up. And thank you. Thank you. Next speakers, if i called your name in addition, robert her and tom harte. President fong, commissioners, director ram, im here representing 45 fremont associates as they are the building directly to the north on fremont street, 350 mission. And our very acute problem is that we did not receive notice of this proceeding or that there was a contemplation an increase of 100 feet in height, six stories, 25 increase in the building adjacent to our building, and in particular, adjacent to our public plaza area. We respectfully request a postponement of a month so that we ca
Again, nominally slight change in the height of the building. This is the existing elevation of the building. This is the extended elevation. A rendering back to the building down fremont. And a view of the building down mission. In each case it shows the existing condition on the left and the proposed extrusion on the right. The building is unique in the sense that it sits directly across from the Transbay Center and weve looked at creating a really unique and public space at the lobby level, a 52foot lobby, which is focused on pedestrian use. This is a shot inside that shows the ability to move freely through the lobby and also some amphitheater type seating to support the retail. Thank you. Okay, thank you. Okay, opening it up to Public Comment. I have a few speaker cards. Rita alber. Gita vash. Paula [speaker not understood]. And daria venisee. Good afternoon, commissioners. Paula pratt low and gita had to leave. We are not familiar with your unique process, so, its been quite an e