Little skeptical wondering whether or not the tone of the country back in 65 to 70 was different than five years from today. Can you reassure me that the data or can you sort of elaborate on what you think the tone will be in five years or what makes you believe that the data will win out . Well, the good news is in five years i will be retired. No, look, i cant tell you what its going to be like in five years in our country. What i can say is dont forget in 1965 why we had to pass Voting Rights and all that stuff. Remember the part of the country that opposed all this stuff. Thats precisely the part of the country that delayed implementation of medicaid. Let me tell you about my high school. I grew up in rural arkansas. Brown vs. Board of education was 1954. We finally got total integration in 197071, my senior year. How long is that . So that part of the country totally opposed all of that stuff. And yet in five years, every Southern State had had created a medicaid program. The stat
The summit 11 00 a. M. Eastern time. Well begin with your thoughts on u. S. Russian relations. Are we in a new cold war . President obama was asked that question. He said no. But where do you think this is all headed . Join the conversation on twitter or facebook. Com cspan. You can email us also. A reporter last week after president barack obama made the announcement of another round of sanctions against russia had the question whether or not this is a new cold war. Heres what the president had to say. No, its not a new cold war. It is a very specific issue related to russias unwillingness to recognize that ukraine can chart its own path. And i think that if you listen to petro poroschenko, they have said they seek good relations with russia. What they cant accept is russia arming separatists who are carrying out terribly destructive activities inside of ukraine, thereby undermining the ability of ukraine to govern itself peacefully. Thats something that no country should have to acce
The speaker pro tempore the gentleman will address his comments to the speaker. The gentleman is recognized. Mr. Marino i urge my colleagues to vote for this legislation because apparently i hit the right nerve. I yield back. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from pennsylvania yields back. The gentleman from kentucky reserves. The gentlewoman from new york is recognized. The gentlewoman from new york is recognized. Mrs. Lowey i yield one minute to the gentleman from washington, adam smith. The speaker pro tempore the gentlewoman from the gentleman from washington is recognized for one minute. The gentleman from washington the gentleman is correct. The house will be in order. The gentleman from washington will be recognized. Recognized for one minute. Mr. Smith i rise in opposition to thillbnd also the bill that will follow. We have a humanitarian crisis the speaker pro tempore the gentleman is correct. The gentleman will suspend. The house is not in order. The house will be in orde
And due process oriented who oppose these piece of legislation. I urbling my colleagues to vote no and yield back the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentlewoman from california yields back. The gentlewoman from new york reserves. The gentleman from kentucky is recognized. Mr. Rogers i yield two minutes to the gentleman from indiana, mr. Stutzman. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized for two minutes. Mr. Stutzman thank you, mr. Speaker. I thank the gentleman from kentucky for his dedication and hard work to finding a solution to a problem that none of us created here in this chamber. And i rise today in strong support of this supplemental appropriations bill for the crisis thats going on on our border. Im very proud of our conference this week, seeking input and solutions from members, taking the time to make sure that this legislation deals with the problem and crafting this legislation to make sure that theres no loopholes and that we deal with the spec
Acknowledged, absolutely no chance that he will sign legislation into law. So the was lessons of the cause of the crisis. The 2012 executive action to put deportations on hold for two years and it is known as the deferred action for childhood arrivals. So leaders have reworked the bill i think additional funding so boosting the cost of 700 million. They also tend to vote on legislation to prevent future executive orders that would give amnesty in any form to Illegal Immigrants of any age. Republican reaction to the news is still mixed. I dont see myself supporting this unless it was voted on first. That is the most important part of this. Is stopping the problem which created the tsunami of humans we are funding the state so they will have the ability to be able to actually secure their borders and we will be sending kids back in realtime to their country when they come in illegally. Democrats united in pointing out today that the bill is not likely to go anywhere again and it may cost