We have a contract with lang Engineering Environmental to provide Environmental Conservation services to tida to monitor the navys Environmental Program, and we brought them on in 2013. This is a Selection Process that actually had been contacted before i arrived to tida. They replaced amec engineering and infrastructure. The contract was original term of three years with two oneyear optional extensions. A contract is scheduled to expire at the end of this fiscal year. I wanted to bring it to the board to discuss whether to issue a new rfq for the remainder of the navys environmental work or to modify the existing contract through the projected remaining four years of the work. Bringing in now for discussion and board action because if were going to issue a new rfq, we need to do so propermptly. So they do attempt the navys base closure meetings. We attend the monthly meetings between the navy and the state regulators. Its also attended typically on the phone by sfpuc and other city ag
We talk about a fair and transparent election, the millions of dollars that get spent in these elections really do give a disproportionate voice to the wealthiest among us to determine who our representatives will be. That said, i want to honor what many members of the public have said. You know, and step back from the nomination, but i do want to thank supervisor fewer for that generous nomination. I also, chair, president tang, if i may, wanted to address one nominee that i heard from many members of the public and in fact she was my first choice and i would have really liked to have nominated her today and that is city administrator naomi kelly. She is someone had has served at the helm of the city for decades and is a great public servant. And would have been a perfect fit for the interim mayor role. For very similar reasons as to why the board in 2010 had shr selected then city administrator ed lee. I know she is close to ed lee and would have carried his principles and policies f
Comment. Im no. 3, Consent Agenda. All matters listed here under a constituted Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the committee and will be acted on by a single vote of the committee. There will be no separate vote unless the member of the Committee Suggests and it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item. Item 3a, approving the minutes of the meeting. I move for the approval. I second the motion. Item no. 4, Environmental Program support. Thank you, chair richardson, director and president tsen. This item will go to the board as an action item. I wanted to have a conversation here before taking it there because we kind of have two different paths Going Forward ahead of us. We have a contract with lang Engineering Environmental to provide Environmental Conservation services to tida to monitor the navys Environmental Program, and we brought them on in 2013. This is a Selection Process that actually had been contacted before i arrived to tida.
Between thirty to hundred and 20 percent of medium inflicting income that left the mission that is hundred and 80 per year in the same time period hundred and 60 eviction noticed filed similarly between 2000 and 2000 more 13 hundred latinos left the mission there were only 38. 5 and the trend continues comparison the households medium income in the mission many 2013 was in the 70s for latino households on in the 40,000 who are those low and moderate theyre our dish waushz a construction workers our nonprofits and teachers and accountants the whole range of working class folks this shows those households are declining faster in the mission this rate has deliberated as b. C. Far back as 2000 if we dont put a solution in place same holds true for eviction nos after a period of decline during the recession years the total number of evictions in mission were increased increased over 1 hundred thousand between 2010 and 2013 in 2013 ellis act soared in the mission if we look at what prop k tr
Accountants the whole range of working class folks this shows those households are declining faster in the mission this rate has deliberated as b. C. Far back as 2000 if we dont put a solution in place same holds true for eviction nos after a period of decline during the recession years the total number of evictions in mission were increased increased over 1 hundred thousand between 2010 and 2013 in 2013 ellis act soared in the mission if we look at what prop k translates into based on the pipeline for the mission that is the approximate goal of 5 hundred to hundred affordable units for comparison if we use the Housing Element they said theres a need ever a little bit over 2 the house units in the year in the low to moderate income range in addition when we look at this the Small Business issues on 24th as well as others corridors the lease rentals are double to trip h triple the rent and only month to month leases that makes it harder for a longer plan weve heard accounts and trying t