given three, four years to be implemented. it s now about to be implemented october 1, where the market place will be open people will be able to choose health care and give affordable quality health care to at least 30 million more people than have availability to it now. we think that s very important. it s been a tough fight. very frankly, we need to see how it works, correct it where it doesn t, and make sure it works properly to do what we want it to do and that s provide affordable health care to our people. we ve got to leave it however, congressman. in order to keep the government running and not see a shutdown, to fund the government for another year, this is a nonstarter as far as you re concerned. you d rather see the government shut down than delay implementation of obama care for a year? nobody wants to see the government shut down. nobody ought to put it in that context. we had an election in 2012.
lobbyists, to weaken the rules and go light and describe to the regulators that they intended less and less regulation and to say, you ve got to do less. let s create this little technical part over here and another loophole. let s delay implementation. in a sense the banks have continue e continued, these largest financial institutions have continued a business as usual. they will decide how much risk ty take on. they will continue to take the profit off the top and they will continue to leave the risks out there for the american taxpayer while they fight off any regulation off to the side. so far, it s worked pretty well for them. the problem now is that jpmorgan has had to admit that, wow, it
regulators that they intended less and less regulation and to say, you ve got to do less. let s create this little technical part over here and another loophole. let s delay implementation. in a sense the banks have continued ed continued, these largest financial institutions have continued a business as usual. they will decide how much risk tyke take on. they will continue to take the profit off the top and they will continue to leave the risks out there for the american taxpayer while they fight off any regulation off to the side. so far, it s worked pretty well for them. the problem now is that jpmorgan has had to admit that, wow, it really did take on a whole lot of risk and that it really got
was to spend in armies of lobbyists to lob by congress, weaken the rules, go light, describe to the regulators that really intended less and less regulation and to two aftgo aft regulators and say to the regulators, you know, you ve got to do less, let s create this little technical part over here, another loophole over there. let s delay implementation. so in a sense, what s been going on is that the banks have continued, these largest financial institutions have continued a kind of business as usual. they will decide how much risk to take on. they will decide how to run their business practices. they will continue to take the profits off the top. and they will continue to leave the risks out there for the american taxpayer. while they fight off any regulation off to the side. so far, it s worked pretty well for them. the problem now is that jpmorgan