Page 5 - Density Bonus News Today

In its stunning opinion delivered on May 12 in Tiburon Open Space Committee v. County of Marin (May 12, 2022, A159860) __ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ (2022 WL 198892) (Tiburon Open Space Committee)...

Affordable housing advocates say a citywide program is working as intended, boosting the production of both market-rate and deed-restricted affordable homes.

Revised project to be presented at June 8 meeting; residents’ group’s lawsuits remain pending

VACAVILLE — The Planning Commission will host a virtual special meeting at 6 p.m. Monday that will feature a public hearing on the Oak Grove Apartments. The proposed plan is to construct a new 60-unit apartment complex for affordable age-restricted senior housing on a 2.11-acre site at 475 W. Monte

By Mark McDermott A proposed four-story, 79-unit residential development at the Veranda’s site on Rosecrans has met resident opposition, but could be approved…

A January 7, 2022, decision from California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal in Bankers Hill 150 v. City of San Diego Case No. D077963 confirms local agencies’ limited discretion to deny – or require a redesign – of qualifying projects under California’s Density Bonus Law.

A January 7, 2022, decision from California's Fourth District Court of Appeal in Bankers Hill 150 v. City of San Diego (Case No. D077963) confirms local agencies' limited discretion to...

Government Code section 65915, commonly referred to as the “Density Bonus Law,” (DBL) was first enacted in 1979 with the aim to address a housing shortage in California. Among other...

VACAVILLE — The Planning Commission gave unanimous approval Tuesday to the City Council’s revised plans to the Allison Apartments affordable housing project. The project proposal is to now construct a 135-unit affordable apartment on a vacant 3.65-acre site, located at the southeast corner of

VACAVILLE — The Planning Commission will once again take up the topic of the proposed Allison Apartments at 6 p.m. Tuesday, a meeting that’s set to take place virtually by teleconference. The applicant revised the project to address concerns recently expressed by the City Council. The revised