Thats different than his, perhaps, more gran yu thats different than his, perhaps, more gran ylar daily gripes on twitter where hes talking about former fbi employees, lisa page and peter strzok or bruce ohr, someone whos currently at the Justice Department who hes threatened w withdraw his security clearance. Those are individual cases. The Justice Department doesnt comment on those. Today it was digit becaufferent it was about the Attorney Generals control over the Justice Department and felt like it was time to push back and this, oching of courf course, i. He rarely does this. He always, as every single event, sessions goes out of his way to praise the president. To talk about furtherering his agenda. But the one time that he did push back was back in february where, again, the president questioned his integrity. He said what the Attorney General had been doing at the Justice Department surrounding carter page, and surveillance and fisa, those issues that have become also familiar
to keep information away from the american people. but i think that it s not going to have a real impact. we don t recognize that limitation at all, and what s more, they don t recognize that limitation. they say it s well-established doj policy that the prosecutor can t talk about this. the department doesn t comment on people not indicted, tell that to bill barr. if the attorney general ignores the doj policy, then how does he have any right to ask bob mueller or anyone else to follow this policy when it s not a policy at all? and we are lucky to be leading off our discussion tonight with two members of the committees who will be questioning robert mueller tomorrow, democratic congressman jamie raskin of maryland. he s a member of the house judiciary committee and democratic congressman peter welch of vermont. he is a member of the house intelligence committee. congressman raskin, let me go to this issue of will robert mueller be testifying alone or how is it going to work? will
to say. it s part of the ongoing cover-up by the administration to keep information away from the american people. but i think that it s not going to have a real impact. we don t recognize that limitation at all, and what s more, they don t recognize that limitation. they say it s well-established doj policy that the prosecutor can t talk about this. the department doesn t comment on people not indicted, tell that to bill barr. if the attorney general ignores the doj policy, then how does he have any right to ask bob mueller or anyone else to follow this policy when it s not a policy at all? and we are lucky to be leading off our discussion tonight with two members of the committees who will be questioning robert mueller tomorrow, democratic congressman jamie raskin of maryland. he s a member of the house judiciary committee and democratic congressman peter welch of vermont. he is a member of the house intelligence committee. congressman raskin, let me go to this issue of will robe
that s different than his, perhaps, more gran yu that s different than his, perhaps, more gran ylar daily gripes on twitter where he s talking about former fbi employees, lisa page and peter strzok or bruce ohr, someone who s currently at the justice department who he s threatened w withdraw his security clearance. those are individual cases. the justice department doesn t comment on those. today it was digit becaufferent it was about the attorney general s control over the justice department and felt like it was time to push back and this, oching of courf course, i. he rarely does this. he always, as every single event, sessions goes out of his way to praise the president. to talk about furtherering his agenda. but the one time that he did push back was back in february where, again, the president questioned his integrity. he said what the attorney general had been doing at the justice department surrounding carter page, and surveillance and fisa, those issues that have become also fa