Also a fourth line this morning for those that supported rand pauls father, ron paul, when he did his president ial bid three times. Do you now support his son . We want to hear from you. You can also send us a tweet or a comment at facebook, or send us an email. The phone lines are open. I want to send you that show you a tweet the senator sent out yesterday. He said, after my speech tomorrow ill be using it and doing a little queue and day to take your questions. Doing a little q a to take your questions. Also using this video to treat his campaign. [video clip] there are probably few candidates for 2016 that are more interesting that rand paul. Rand paul has been the most consistently principled person. Senator from kentucky might be the candidate who ends up winning this thing. Hes got organization in all 50 states. Hes got africanamericans taking a look at him. Defense washington, we cannot have business as usual. Congress should read every bill. [applause] congress should also li
Puts a damper on the thanksgiving turkey undercover investigators reported footage of the crowded set preconditions add turkey Breeding Farm more on that later in the shelf. Its wednesday november twenty seven signed in washington dc. I mean youre a david youre watching our tea. We begin to date with new revelations regarding the National Security agency according to secret documents obtained by the Huffington Post through adverts not in this they participated in tracking the on line Sexual Activity if people the agency considered to be pope radicalized or is not part of the proposed plan to target six different muslims thought to have been influencing the opinions of others in carrying out theurveillance the agency was hoping to harm your reputation and undermine their credibility as Muslim Leaders in the community the documents reveal that the nsa was monitoring those who were viewing sexually explicit material on line and using sexually explicit persuades the persuasive language whe
One of the things that was really appealing as it is for all of these neighbors plus others who didnt have time to come because of the short notice was the fact we had views. Some great, not all of them, but we had partial views of the water. We paid for those views. All of us paid for those views, okay . The proposed addition, not just the floor, because if you look at the plan, its not just an additional flash, floor, but the solar panels. You are almost looking at adding two floors, not one. They block the water view and i know right to view not necessarily, but what about right to value . We pay taxes and we pay taxes on property and property is high because you have a view. Well, with this thing we will no longer have any views. And the question also is addition to solar panels under the draft motion it says, the project is desirable as in keeping with the neighborhood character of tall multiunit buildings. What about the neighborhood character that isnt next door to the building
They block the water view and i know right to view not necessarily, but what about right to value . We pay taxes and we pay taxes on property and property is high because you have a view. Well, with this thing we will no longer have any views. And the question also is addition to solar panels under the draft motion it says, the project is desirable as in keeping with the neighborhood character of tall multiunit buildings. What about the neighborhood character that isnt next door to the building . What about the neighborhood character of People Like Us on jackson street on which there are multiple buildings that face this view . Were all affected by this one owner, one singular addition for one families. Were not talking about adding more space for families, but a penthouse for some owner who will block the view and dress decrease the value for all of us in the neighborhood. This is part of the character of the city. You cant encroach by building more and more higher and higher building
A reduction of a few few could mitigate and at the same time not unduly hinder the project for the sponsors plan. Others are materially harmed by it, so should there be some design restraint when taking away the cherished and economically valuable views of many others . Why isnt such a modest compromise in the best interest of the community . In addition to having insufficient time, insufficient notification, i would like to comment on the lack of due process. We were dumbfounded when we read the december 6th executive summary that recommends the approval of the conditional use application. How can this report be written before all sides have had an opportunity to express their comments and opinions at the hearing today . Isnt this what this hearing today is for . This is our first opportunity to speak to the city authorities on this matter, and it appears to us that its getting rammed through before affected partis can comment. For these reasons we do not feel the Planning Commission