during the trial, freeman s defense attorney pointed to the two foreign hairs in laura s apartment as proof that someone else killed laura. and also reminded the jury that the eyewitness description didn t match freeman either. i mean, they argued reasonable doubt, which was a smart argument to make. but prosecutors maintained that the dna evidence was concrete proof. i think what happened here was that sam freeman didn t realize in 1992 he could leave a piece of himself at the scene other than semen, blood or fingerprints. but he did. in september of 2006, a jury found sam freeman guilty of first-degree murder. he was sentenced to life in prison without parole. i want people to have hope and never give up. never give up on justice. that some day it ll come about. if it had not been for the proper collection and preservation, it doesn t matter
two foreign hairs in laura s apartment as proof that someone else killed laura. and also reminded the jury that the eyewitness description didn t match freeman either. i mean, they argued reasonable doubt which was a smart argument to make. but prosecutors maintained that the dna evidence was concrete proof. i think what happened here was that sam freeman didn t realize in 1992 he could leave a piece of himself at the scene other than semen, blood or fingerprints. but he did. in september of 2006, a jury found sam freeman guilty of first-degree murder. he was sentenced to life in prison without parole. i want people to have hope and never give up. never give up on justice. that some day it ll come about. if it had not been for the proper collection and preservation, it doesn t matter
apartment as proof that someone else killed laura. and also reminded the jury that the eyewitness description didn t match freeman either. i mean, they argued reasonable doubt which was a smart argument to make. but prosecutors maintained that the dna evidence was concrete proof. i think what happened here was that sam freeman didn t realize in 1992 he could leave a piece of himself at the scene other than semen, blood or fingerprints. but he did. in september of 2006, a jury found sam freeman guilty of first-degree murder. he was sentenced to life in prison without parole. i want people to have hope and never give up. never give up on justice. that some day it ll come about. if it had not been for the proper collection and
rejected, spurned, and he got the ultimate last say with laura wynn with this crime. during the trial, freeman s defense attorney pointed to the two foreign hairs in laura s apartment as proof that someone else killed laura. and also reminded the jury that the eyewitness description didn t match freeman either. i mean, they argued reasonable doubt which was a smart argument to make. but prosecutors maintained that the dna evidence was concrete proof. i think what happened here was that sam freeman didn t realize in 1992 he could leave a piece of himself at the scene other than semen, blood or fingerprints. but he did. in september of 2006, a jury found sam freeman guilty of first-degree murder. he was sentenced to life in prison without parole. i want people to have hope and never give up.